OPINION — As Israel launches some of the expansive covert-kinetic operations in latest reminiscence in opposition to Iranian nuclear infrastructure, a crucial query returns: can airpower—supported by superior ISR, precision-guided munitions, and even U.S. bunker-busting weapons—completely dismantle a hardened and decentralized nuclear program? The reply isn’t any. That is still true even when america dedicated its full arsenal of deep-penetration munitions and stealth plane. Iran’s nuclear system is constructed not simply to withstand bodily strikes, however to outlive them—strategically, legally, and doctrinally.
Begin with Fordow, Iran’s most fortified enrichment web site. It sits buried 80 to 90 meters deep contained in the Kuh-e Daryacheh mountains. The U.S. GBU-57A/B Large Ordnance Penetrator can pierce as much as 60 meters of strengthened concrete beneath superb circumstances—but it surely’s not designed to penetrate layers of deep mountain rock, which scatter blast results and cut back influence. Even when a bomb penetrates, it’s not possible to substantiate the destruction of IR-6 centrifuge arrays or decide the destiny of enriched uranium. Destroying a constructing will not be the identical as eliminating the capability for breakout.
Natanz, the better-known web site, poses totally different issues. Its services are extra uncovered however have already proven resilience. The 2009–2010 Stuxnet assault disrupted rotor speeds; in 2021, an influence grid assault shut down cascades. Each efforts averted explosive sabotage to stop aerosolizing saved uranium. Strikes on cascade halls or storage vaults might set off precisely that final result. In the meantime, Iran was constructing new, deeper cascade chambers at Natanz—modeled after Fordow’s hardened design.
However these tactical considerations are simply the floor. Since a minimum of 2003, Iran has remodeled its nuclear program right into a compartmentalized, redundant community. The Atomic Vitality Group of Iran (AEOI) oversees public-facing websites, whereas crucial R&D, procurement, and supplies engineering are embedded throughout the Ministry of Protection, the military-linked SPND, and IRGC-run logistics and engineering corporations. Universities like Malek Ashtar, Sharif, and Shahid Beheshti—sanctioned for proliferation-related analysis—assist superior work on centrifuge rotors, uranium metallurgy, and simulation fashions. The gas cycle is unfold throughout a number of cities: conversion at Isfahan, enrichment at Fordow and Natanz, heavy water manufacturing at Arak. Knock out one node, and others stay. This technique wasn’t constructed simply to perform—it was constructed to outlive.
The IRGC’s Passive Protection Group has guided this shift because the early 2010s, hardening and camouflaging websites, transferring property underground, and routing logistics by way of civilian infrastructure. Its strategy echoes Soviet and North Korean doctrine: survive the primary strike, reconstitute after. Twin-use services, buried nodes, and cell corridors kind a system designed to not forestall assault, however to soak up it.
A turning level on this evolution was Iran’s transfer to totally home centrifuge manufacturing. Earlier than, Iran relied on illicit procurement networks for delicate elements like rotors and bellows. Now it manufactures them utilizing its personal aerospace and metallurgical sectors. This transformation has rendered conventional interdiction methods out of date. There are now not international provide chains to focus on. Disrupting manufacturing now means hanging sovereign industrial vegetation not legally outlined as nuclear websites—elevating main questions beneath worldwide regulation about proportionality, attribution, and escalation.
Since Friday, Israel has reportedly killed 14 Iranian nuclear scientists. However the strategic influence might be restricted. These personnel had been a part of a deep and compartmentalized labor construction that features rotor fabrication groups, enrichment system modelers, and logistics engineers—a lot of whom stay untouched. Iran’s nuclear information is archived, teachable, and distributed by way of categorised tutorial applications and military-run technical institutes. Continuity doesn’t rely on who’s killed—it will depend on what survives.
Even when a strike damages services, it received’t present strategic certainty. Since Iran ended its implementation of the JCPOA’s Further Protocol in 2021, the IAEA has misplaced steady entry to surveillance footage and now not has what Director Common Rafael Grossi calls “continuity of information.” When inspectors visited the Turquzabad warehouse in 2018—after its publicity by Israeli intelligence—they discovered undeclared nuclear materials. That is still the one web site revealed, however others might exist. And whereas Iran’s enrichment ranges now far exceed JCPOA limits—the IAEA stories that Iran holds over 120 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% U-235, only one step beneath weapons-grade—its actions technically stay throughout the bounds of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which permits enrichment of any degree so long as it’s not diverted to weapons use. Iran’s uranium metallic work at Esfahan, for instance, is ostensibly for reactor gas however has clear relevance for constructing warhead cores. Enrichment cascades, uranium conversion, and simulation software program all stay dual-use by design. A bombing marketing campaign can get rid of gear, however not the authorized narrative, institutional construction, or strategic doctrine that maintain this system.
The weaponization aspect is even more durable to focus on. A nuclear system requires greater than enriched uranium—it additionally wants implosion methods, neutron initiators, hydrodynamic exams, and precision detonators. In line with the IAEA’s 2011 annex and the Institute for Science and Worldwide Safety stories from 2019 to 2020, primarily based on paperwork from Iran’s nuclear archive , Iran has explored all of those. Testing on the Parchin navy complicated and archived core design information are a part of the report. These property are usually not solely small and relocatable—they don’t even contain fissile materials. They’re almost not possible to detect by ISR, not to mention destroy, and might solely be verified by way of intrusive on-site inspections. Strategically, Iran will not be racing to construct a bomb. It’s positioning itself simply beneath the brink—capable of weaponize quickly with out brazenly violating the NPT. This posture, formalized by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and internalized throughout SPND, maximizes leverage whereas minimizing authorized threat. And it can’t be destroyed from the air.
Nor will a strike yield dependable post-strike readability. Iran has invested in denial and deception: false facades, buried warmth sources, multispectral camouflage, and encrypted site-to-site communications. These frustrate ISR and make battle harm assessments guesswork. The U.S. confronted comparable points in Iraq from 1991 to 2003, the place cell infrastructure routinely eluded satellite tv for pc and aerial surveillance. Iran’s scenario is worse—as a result of there is not any inspector entry, and no ground-truthing. Injury can solely be inferred from secondary signatures like warmth plumes or seismic shockwaves, none of which assure success.
What Iran now possesses is structural latency. That is greater than technical know-how—it’s the flexibility to reconstitute a nuclear program after large-scale bodily degradation. Designs, enriched stockpiles, rotor manufacturing, conversion instruments, simulation fashions, and skilled scientists are unfold throughout the Iranian state. These aren’t hidden threats. They’re sovereign capabilities constructed into the system. The mannequin is comparable to Saddam Hussein’s “just-in-time” reconstitution technique within the Nineties: Iraq had no bombs, however preserved sufficient design knowledge and networks to restart beneath higher circumstances. Iran has intentionally adopted that very same logic. So long as authorized ambiguity is preserved, scientists stay protected, and services go uninspected, no strike can destroy the true core of this system.
Frequent analogies are deceptive. Israel’s 1981 strike on Iraq’s Osirak reactor labored as a result of the ability was pre-operational, had no uranium gas, and no supporting infrastructure. There was no gas cycle, no cascade system, and no redundancy. None of that applies to Iran. Right this moment’s program is hardened, dispersed, and much nearer to the nuclear threshold. Osirak is now not a related mannequin.
There’s additionally no historic precedent for dismantling a program as deeply embedded as Iran’s with out bodily entry. Libya’s 2003 disarmament adopted years of behind-the-scenes negotiations and was catalyzed not simply by concern of invasion, however by Gaddafi’s need to normalize relations with Western banks and oil markets. Libya by no means enriched uranium domestically; its centrifuges had been nonetheless in crates, acquired by way of the A.Q. Khan community, and its warhead designs had been copies of Pakistani blueprints. South Africa, in contrast, had constructed six nuclear weapons—but it surely dismantled them in secret between 1989 and 1991 beneath a tightly managed home program, then revealed their existence solely after apartheid’s finish to facilitate worldwide reintegration. The method was pushed by regime transition, not exterior stress, and was verified solely after full IAEA entry. Syria’s al-Kibar reactor, destroyed by Israel in 2007, was primarily based on a North Korean gas-graphite design and had no assist infrastructure: no enrichment, no reprocessing, and no declared power program to obscure it. No bombing marketing campaign can replicate the political and technical circumstances that enabled disarmament in these circumstances.
A very efficient dismantlement would resemble not strikes, however a floor incursion. It will contain seizing Fordow and Natanz, securing uranium stockpiles, capturing cascade schematics and procurement data, and both debriefing or eradicating scientists tied to the IRGC, AEOI, and college analysis applications. It will require IAEA and intelligence personnel embedded on-site, conducting forensic audits in centrifuge labs, metallurgy workshops, and simulation facilities. That is what labored in Iraq and Libya: management, not simply precision. No air marketing campaign can do this from 35,000 ft.
At greatest, the airstrikes will purchase time. At worst, they may destroy inspection leverage, push this system additional underground—each bodily and politically—and threat triggering the very breakout they purpose to stop. They provide the looks of decision, not its substance. Denial, whether it is to be actual, should transcend momentary disruption. It should imply verified elimination of capability, management of personnel, and bodily entry to infrastructure. The onerous fact is that this: if disarmament is the purpose—as President Trump insists when he says Iran must not ever purchase a nuclear weapon—then airstrikes alone received’t obtain it.
The Cipher Transient is dedicated to publishing a variety of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals.
Opinions expressed are these of the writer and don’t characterize the views or opinions of The Cipher Transient.
Have a perspective to share primarily based in your expertise within the nationwide safety area? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient