Repair Community With 8 Greatest Community Monitoring Software program I Tried

Hey, is the community performing bizarre for you, too?

I barely had time to reply earlier than extra messages flooded in. File transfers stalled, video calls froze mid-sentence, and even logging into important apps turned unimaginable. Productiveness throughout the workplace floor to a cease.

As an worker in one in every of my earlier jobs, I wasn’t answerable for the community, however I used to be actually feeling the ache. Deadlines loomed, and frustration constructed up as we sat there, unable to do our jobs. IT scrambled to diagnose the problem, however it was all guesswork with out the finest community monitoring software program. Was it a bandwidth hog? A failing swap? A distributed denial of service (DDoS) assault? No person knew.

They rebooted routers, ran primary diagnostics, and tried a couple of fast fixes, however nothing labored. The hours dragged on, shoppers had been left ready, and pressing work piled up. Hours later, they lastly uncovered the perpetrator: an unnoticed backup course of was silently choking the community with extreme site visitors. As soon as recognized, it took minutes to resolve, however the injury was already executed: misplaced time, missed deadlines, pissed off workers, and aggravated clients.

That have caught with me. I noticed firsthand how costly and disruptive community blind spots could be. With out real-time community monitoring, small points spiral into business-wide crises. Efficiency slows with out rationalization, safety threats go undetected, and outages hit on the worst attainable moments.

Not too long ago, I examined one of the best community monitoring software program to assist others keep away from these identical complications. Whether or not coping with random slowdowns, surprising downtime, safety threats, or mysterious bandwidth spikes, I’ll make it easier to discover the fitting community monitoring instrument on this article. 

IT nightmares? 8 finest community monitoring software program to finish them

Community monitoring software program is like having a 24/7 watchtower over a community. It continuously scans, tracks, and analyzes site visitors, making certain every thing runs easily. With out it, I’d be flying blind, ready for one thing to interrupt earlier than realizing there’s an issue. With it, I get real-time visibility right into a community’s well being to repair points earlier than they grow to be full-blown outages.

The perfect community monitoring software program collects information and is sensible of it. I’ve seen instruments that pinpoint bandwidth hogs, detect safety threats, and alert me when one thing goes unsuitable. As an alternative of scrambling to diagnose gradual connections or downtime, I get on the spot insights into the place the issue is and methods to repair it.

I’ve additionally realized that not all community monitoring instruments are created equal. Some solely monitor primary metrics, whereas one of the best ones give me a whole image, from latency and packet loss to uncommon site visitors spikes and unauthorized entry makes an attempt. The correct software program helps me stop them earlier than they impression enterprise operations.

After testing a number of community monitoring options, I’ve discovered that one of the best instruments are quick, dependable, and straightforward to make use of. They don’t bury me in difficult logs or require fixed babysitting. As an alternative, they ship real-time alerts, good automation, and clear insights that hold a community operating easily with minimal effort.

How I evaluated one of the best community monitoring software program options

Right here’s what I thought of whereas testing one of the best networking monitoring instruments.

• Actual-time monitoring and alerts: When evaluating community monitoring software program, I concentrate on real-time monitoring and alerts as a result of detecting points as they occur is essential. With out real-time visibility, small issues can escalate into expensive outages. The perfect instruments present steady monitoring and on the spot alerts by way of electronic mail, SMS, or integrations with platforms like Slack. I search for software program that enables me to set customized thresholds for efficiency metrics like CPU utilization, bandwidth consumption, and latency. A robust alerting system ensures I can reply rapidly earlier than customers or clients discover an issue.
• Protocol and machine compatibility: Networks comprise varied gadgets and working methods, all speaking by means of totally different protocols. If a monitoring instrument lacks assist for key protocols like SNMP, ICMP, or NetFlow, I do know it received’t give me full visibility into my infrastructure. I desire instruments monitoring efficiency throughout routers, switches, servers, cloud environments, and IoT gadgets. With out this degree of compatibility, gaps in monitoring can depart vital points undetected.
• Bandwidth and site visitors evaluation: I want software program that tracks bandwidth utilization and analyzes site visitors patterns to determine bottlenecks and unauthorized exercise. I can optimize efficiency and allocate bandwidth the place wanted by pinpointing which functions or customers devour essentially the most sources. Historic information monitoring is equally necessary for forecasting future community capability wants and avoiding surprising slowdowns.
• Risk detection and safety monitoring: I want a community monitoring instrument that may detect anomalies like uncommon site visitors spikes, unauthorized entry makes an attempt, and potential DDoS assaults. Some community monitoring options combine with safety platforms, including an additional layer of safety by detecting and responding to suspicious exercise. With out built-in safety monitoring, networks are susceptible to threats that might compromise delicate information and disrupt operations.
• Cloud and hybrid community assist: With extra companies adopting cloud options, cloud and hybrid community assist has grow to be vital. I search for community monitoring software program to trace on-premise and cloud-based infrastructures, together with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Hybrid networks are more and more frequent, so the flexibility to observe each bodily and virtualized environments from a single dashboard is important. Digital non-public community (VPN) and distant entry monitoring are additionally essential, particularly as distant work turns into extra widespread.
• Reporting and information visualization: A community monitoring instrument is simply as helpful as its skill to current information clearly and actionably. Robust reporting and information visualization assist me analyze community tendencies, troubleshoot recurring points, and justify upgrades to stakeholders. I desire instruments that supply real-time dashboards, historic pattern evaluation, and customizable stories. The flexibility to export stories in a number of codecs or combine with third-party analytics instruments makes community monitoring much more invaluable.

To be included within the community monitoring software program class, a product should:

• Repeatedly monitor the efficiency of a complete pc community
• Set up a regular baseline for community efficiency metrics
• Notify directors of crashes or deviations from regular efficiency
• Advocate options when efficiency points happen
• Provide visible representations of community efficiency information

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions could have been edited for readability.  

One of many greatest benefits I see with NinjaOne is its computerized patch administration. Protecting methods up to date with out guide intervention is a big plus, particularly when managing a number of gadgets. I haven’t got to fret about lacking safety patches or vital updates as a result of the system handles it proactively.

The big selection of distant choices accessible with NinjaOne makes it stand out. Whether or not I must troubleshoot a workstation, push updates, or monitor system efficiency, I’ve a number of methods to entry gadgets remotely. The flexibility to attach seamlessly with out complicated setups or extra instruments saves effort and time.

A well-designed dashboard and ticketing system could make an enormous distinction in every day operations, and NinjaOne delivers on this space. I can monitor system efficiency, assessment alerts, and handle tickets all from a centralized location. This degree of visibility helps in prioritizing points and making certain that nothing falls by means of the cracks.

Some monitoring instruments can decelerate gadgets, however from what I’ve gathered, NinjaOne appears to have a comparatively low system footprint. It’s designed to run within the background with out considerably affecting machine efficiency. That is necessary as a result of nobody desires monitoring software program that causes lag or disrupts workflow.

One of many recurring points I’ve seen with NinjaOne is its alerting system. It doesn’t all the time present the extent of customization or granularity wanted for efficient community monitoring. Typically, alerts could not set off on the proper time, or they may be too generic to be actionable. If I can’t belief the alerts to offer well timed and related notifications, it reduces the effectiveness of the software program.

Reporting is one other space the place NinjaOne falls brief. Whereas it offers stories, there’s not a lot flexibility when it comes to customizing them to suit particular wants. If I need detailed insights tailor-made to my enterprise necessities, I’d discover myself pissed off by the shortage of choices.

Whereas I discover the the dashboard to be usually well-structured, some components of NinjaOne’s interface can really feel unintuitive. Discovering particular settings or troubleshooting sure points could require extra clicks than obligatory. If a person has to spend additional time searching down configurations, it slows down workflow effectivity.

As a community monitoring software program, NinjaOne may gain advantage from stronger built-in community evaluation options. Whereas it covers important machine monitoring, it doesn’t supply the identical depth of community efficiency insights as some opponents. If I want detailed community site visitors evaluation, I may need to depend on extra third-party instruments.

What I dislike about NinjaOne:

• One of many issues that issues me about NinjaOne is its alerting system. I want alerts which might be particular and well timed, however from what I’ve seen, they will typically be too generic or inconsistent.
• Reporting ought to be versatile sufficient to generate insights that align with my particular wants, however NinjaOne doesn’t appear to supply a lot when it comes to customization. If I want detailed, tailor-made stories, I may need to spend additional time pulling information manually or utilizing exterior instruments.

What G2 customers dislike about NinjaOne:

“NinjaOne could be tough to get off the bottom operating. Whereas it may be utilized out of the field for many performance to begin with, to essentially use the instrument requires customization. This customization could be tough at instances as it may be a fairly massive studying curve.

Happily there are a number of avenues for help with setup and even help after it’s up and operating. There are engineers accessible to be scheduled to help with onboarding points making this daunting proeces simpler. All that being mentioned there are nonetheless drawbacks. Implementation could be tough. Determining the move of every thing is tough at first however value it in the long run.”

– NinjaOne Evaluation, Brandon S.

I like Atera’s distant monitoring functionality. It offers a stable method to oversee community well being with out being bodily current, which is useful for IT professionals managing a number of websites. The steadiness of the distant options means fewer pointless journeys and faster troubleshooting. It additionally helps in proactive upkeep fairly than reacting to issues after they escalate. Understanding that I can monitor methods successfully with out all the time being on-site provides me a way of management. 

The automation instruments in Atera assist cut back the repetitive work IT groups must deal with. I recognize how Atera enables you to arrange routine upkeep duties like software program updates, system well being checks, and alerts with minimal intervention. This not solely saves time but in addition reduces the chance of human error. Automating these processes means IT professionals can concentrate on higher-priority duties fairly than getting slowed down in routine upkeep. 

Atera usually maintains a steady efficiency, which is essential for any community monitoring software program. A instrument that crashes or lags can create larger issues than it solves, however Atera appears to carry up properly beneath regular situations. For me, a steady platform means fewer disruptions when resolving points or monitoring vital methods.

Atera appears to be continuously evolving, with updates that introduce significant enhancements. A platform that actively listens to suggestions and rolls out helpful options seems like a instrument value investing in. I really feel assured that performance isn’t stagnant, and future updates would possibly tackle present limitations. 

The cellular app might use extra growth to match the performance of the desktop model. Whereas it does present some entry to monitoring options, it doesn’t really feel as responsive or feature-rich correctly. I’d anticipate a cellular app to offer me full management over vital capabilities when working remotely, however that’s not all the time the case with Atera.

Whereas alerts are a core a part of any monitoring software program, Atera’s notification system typically feels extreme. As an alternative of specializing in essentially the most vital points, I’d obtain minor alerts that don’t require instant consideration. This could result in alert fatigue, the place necessary warnings may be neglected due to all of the noise.

Buyer assist is necessary for any software program, and Atera’s response instances appear inconsistent. I’ve seen some customers report fast resolutions whereas others have confronted delays when resolving points. When coping with community monitoring, delays in assist can imply prolonged downtime or unresolved technical issues.

What I dislike about Atera:

• Whereas Atera’s cellular app offers some performance, it doesn’t fairly match the capabilities of the desktop model. When working remotely, I anticipate full management over vital capabilities, however that’s not all the time the case right here.
• Atera’s notification system tends to ship out a flood of alerts, and never all of them are helpful. As an alternative of prioritizing essentially the most vital points, I typically get bombarded with minor notifications that don’t require instant motion. This creates alert fatigue, making it more durable to concentrate on the issues that want consideration.

What G2 customers dislike about Atera:

“The cellular app might use some love. The account creation and credential project might use some automation. It lacks a groups chat integration however I hear that is coming quickly. The ticket templates are company-wide, that means you’ll be able to’t create an onboarding template and solely let the HR division entry these. Atera might additionally do properly with a Energy Automate performance (e.g. when a ticket is submitted containing password reset or onboarding, reset password based mostly off different attributes or create a person account in M365 tenant respectively.).”

– Atera Evaluation, Verified Person in Data Know-how and Companies

One in every of Entuity‘s strongest factors is the way it processes and presents community information. As an alternative of simply amassing info, its monitoring algorithm intelligently analyzes community exercise to offer actionable insights. This implies fewer false alarms and extra correct alerts, and I recognize how this reduces the time spent chasing down pointless notifications.

As an alternative of counting on periodic checks, it constantly tracks community exercise and alerts customers instantly when points come up. I recognize how this characteristic is usually a lifesaver in large-scale environments the place even minor downtime could cause main disruptions. 

Entuity offers a extra complete view of community efficiency than different monitoring instruments. It excels at figuring out community bottlenecks and efficiency tendencies which may not be instantly apparent. I recognize this degree of visibility as a result of it helps me make extra knowledgeable choices about useful resource allocation and infrastructure upgrades.

Whereas Entuity does properly in monitoring, I don’t like that it lacks sturdy community configuration administration. Some opponents present deeper management over community machine configurations, permitting for the automation of duties like firmware updates and coverage enforcement. This implies customers should still want extra instruments to deal with configuration administration effectively.

Some customers really feel that Entuity’s understanding of community ideas might be refined additional. Whereas it handles primary monitoring properly, there are areas the place it won’t absolutely seize the nuances of complicated community environments. For instance, I’ve seen that it doesn’t assist sure superior protocols and applied sciences as successfully as competing options.

One other disadvantage is the shortcoming to ballot gadgets from a number of monitoring stations. This machine polling limitation is a significant problem in distributed community environments the place information should be collected from a number of areas concurrently. With out this functionality, IT groups would possibly want workarounds or extra instruments to get a whole image of their infrastructure.

What I dislike about Entuity:

• I don’t like that Entuity lacks sturdy community configuration administration, so that you would possibly nonetheless want different instruments for duties like firmware updates.
• I discover it irritating that customers can’t ballot gadgets from a number of monitoring stations, making it more durable to get a full image of their community in massive environments.

What G2 customers dislike about Entuity:

“Easy issues, corresponding to being unable to maneuver gadgets throughout pollers and filters not staying. When you choose one thing from that filter and return to that view, the filter disappears.”

– Entuity Evaluation, Randy S.

LogicMonitor automates information assortment and simplifies monitoring with metrics throughout varied infrastructure elements with out requiring intensive guide configuration. This reduces the hassle wanted to take care of visibility into community efficiency. I recognize that this permits groups to focus extra on evaluation fairly than routine monitoring duties.

Since LogicMonitor is SaaS-based, I don’t have to fret about sustaining on-premise {hardware} for monitoring. This removes the burden of managing infrastructure simply to observe different infrastructure. A cloud-based setup means the software program routinely handles updates and patches, making certain the most recent options and safety enhancements are all the time accessible.

I additionally discover the extent of element within the metrics it collects is spectacular. It offers high-level summaries and deep insights into community efficiency, useful resource utilization, and potential points. This type of granularity is efficacious when troubleshooting issues or optimizing community efficiency.

Establishing LogicMonitor is comparatively simple in comparison with another monitoring instruments. The method doesn’t require intensive customization to get it up and operating. I worth this as a result of prolonged deployments can delay productiveness and trigger frustration amongst IT groups.

Whereas the reporting engine works, I’ve seen that customization choices aren’t as versatile as they might be. For a monitoring instrument that collects a lot information, I anticipate extra management over how stories are generated and displayed.

Frequent UI adjustments would possibly problem groups that desire a steady interface. Updates typically require customers to reorient themselves to new layouts and workflows, slowing productiveness. Whereas enhancements are usually welcome, a continuously shifting UI can introduce inefficiencies, particularly for groups used to a sure means of working. I believe a extra gradual method to UI updates could be helpful.

Whereas automation is a powerful level, I’ve seen customers report how customization appears missing in sure areas. For organizations with extremely particular monitoring wants, being unable to tweak configurations as a lot as they’d like might be a disadvantage.

What I dislike about LogicMonitor:

• The reporting engine doesn’t supply sufficient flexibility for personalisation. With a lot information accessible, I want there have been higher methods to regulate how stories are generated.
• Frequent UI adjustments could be irritating when attempting to take care of effectivity. I’d desire a extra steady interface as a substitute of regularly adjusting to new layouts.

What G2 customers dislike about LogicMonitor:

“A few of the UIs and tabs might use a visible overhaul.”

– LogicMonitor Evaluation, Brandon H.

Dynatrace affords sturdy instruments for monitoring infrastructure, functions, and networks. It offers detailed insights that assist diagnose points effectively. With its deep observability, I see the way it allows groups to trace system well being in real-time and proactively tackle potential failures. It appears notably helpful for complicated IT environments the place a number of interconnected methods require fixed oversight.

I additionally like its automated difficulty detection. As an alternative of manually sifting by means of logs or counting on guesswork, I can think about how the synthetic intelligence-driven alerting system rapidly identifies efficiency bottlenecks and anomalies. Notifying groups of potential failures earlier than they escalate can considerably cut back the imply time to decision (MTTR).

I recognize Dynatrace’s skill to present detailed infrastructure analytics, providing visibility into the efficiency of servers, networks, and cloud environments. A transparent image of infrastructure well being at any given second is essential for optimizing efficiency and useful resource allocation. I can see how this helps organizations fine-tune their setups and keep away from over-provisioning or underutilizing sources.

When a service outage happens, restoring performance rapidly is vital. Dynatrace’s detailed diagnostic instruments might help groups quickly find the foundation reason behind failures. I like how the clear breakdowns of dependencies and failure factors considerably cut back troubleshooting time.

Whereas Dynatrace affords intensive capabilities, its sheer quantity of instruments and choices can overwhelm it. The training curve may be steep for groups new to community monitoring or with restricted expertise with superior observability platforms.

I’ve seen that some customers report weaknesses in Dynatrace’s front-end monitoring and alerting capabilities. This might pose a problem for organizations that want full-stack observability, together with person expertise analytics. If frontend efficiency points go undetected, customers would possibly expertise gradual load instances or glitches with out instant visibility into the foundation trigger. 

Dynatrace reportedly can not monitor itself, which looks as if a notable limitation. I dislike how there’s no built-in method to detect or diagnose its failures if the platform experiences a difficulty. Self-monitoring could be necessary in vital community monitoring instruments to make sure reliability. With out this functionality, groups would possibly depend on different strategies to trace Dynatrace’s efficiency and availability.

What I dislike about Dynatrace:

• Whereas I acknowledge Dynatrace’s energy, the sheer quantity of instruments can really feel overwhelming. The training curve appears steep, particularly for groups with out expertise in superior observability platforms.
• I discover it regarding that Dynatrace can not monitor itself. If the platform encounters a difficulty, there’s no built-in method to detect or diagnose failures internally. For a vital community monitoring instrument, this seems like a notable blind spot that might decelerate incident response.

What G2 customers dislike about Dynatrace:

“I am unable to monitor Dynatrace with Dynatrace and repair standing.”

– Dynatrace Evaluation, Jennie T.

Azure Service Well being proactively notifies customers about potential or ongoing service points. As an alternative of ready for issues to be found by means of guide troubleshooting, I like the way it affords alerts about service disruptions earlier than they grow to be main issues. This implies customers can take preemptive motion, whether or not rerouting site visitors, notifying stakeholders, or making ready contingency plans. The proactive nature of the alerts reduces downtime and will increase operational resilience.

Having a personalized dashboard means I don’t must sift by means of pointless particulars to get the insights I want. As an alternative of coping with generic service stories, I can tailor my dashboard to focus solely on the particular providers and areas that matter to me. This focused method improves effectivity as a result of customers are usually not overloaded with irrelevant information. 

Understanding that a difficulty has occurred is one factor, however understanding why it occurred is much more invaluable. Azure Service Well being offers root trigger evaluation (RCA) stories, which suggests customers can acquire perception into what led to a disruption. As an alternative of guessing or making assumptions, I like that the software program affords a concrete breakdown of the trigger, serving to them plan higher for the longer term.

Visibility into service well being is essential for organizations that should meet strict compliance necessities. Azure Service Well being offers detailed historic information on incidents, which could be important for audits and compliance reporting. I recognize how these stories from Azure Service Well being assist customers justify uptime ensures or clarify service disruptions to regulators.

Whereas Azure Service Well being offers nice insights into Azure’s providers, it doesn’t absolutely substitute conventional community monitoring instruments. It primarily focuses on Azure’s infrastructure and providers fairly than offering deep visibility into my inner community efficiency. If I want to observe latency, packet loss, or particular inner connectivity points, I nonetheless want a separate monitoring instrument. 

Whereas Azure Service Well being does present RCA stories, typically the extent of element isn’t ample for troubleshooting at a granular degree. There are situations the place the stories are too high-level, leaving me with unanswered questions on what went unsuitable. If I’m coping with a vital difficulty and the RCA report is imprecise, I may need to spend additional time investigating independently.

Since Azure Service Well being relies on Microsoft’s incident reporting, I’m restricted to the knowledge they select to offer. If a difficulty continues to be beneath investigation or Microsoft hasn’t acknowledged it, I’ll not obtain a right away replace. This implies customers typically must depend on third-party monitoring or social media stories to get a clearer image of what’s taking place.

What I dislike about Azure Service Well being:

• I like that it offers root trigger evaluation, however typically, the stories lack the extent of element I want. Customers will spend additional time determining the true difficulty if the reason is just too imprecise.
• Since Azure Service Well being relies on Microsoft’s updates, I don’t all the time get instant info on rising points. If Microsoft delays acknowledging an issue, customers may need to look elsewhere for particulars.

What G2 customers dislike about Azure Service Well being:

“Dependence on Microsoft means there are some points we can not intervene in or stop. It primarily acts as a communication medium for Microsoft-related service outages. Latency points can’t be monitored or notified by Azure Service Well being. We’d like a further instrument to trace these points externally.”

– Azure Service Well being Evaluation, Murugesh P.

I recognize ManageEngine OpManager’s skill to present a holistic view of a complete community infrastructure. I can see detailed metrics for servers, routers, switches, and functions in a single place. This degree of visibility makes it simpler to pinpoint efficiency bottlenecks earlier than they grow to be full-blown failures. 

ManageEngine OpManager offers instant updates so I can reply to potential points. This implies customers can detect sudden spikes in bandwidth utilization, CPU overloads, or failing community gadgets earlier than they trigger vital downtime. The dashboards and alerts are designed to maintain you proactive fairly than reactive, which is vital in environments the place even a couple of minutes of community failure can have severe penalties. 

Troubleshooting community points could be irritating, however ManageEngine OpManager offers instruments that make the method simpler. For instance, I can analyze historic efficiency tendencies to determine patterns which may point out a recurring difficulty. One other standout characteristic is the flexibility to simulate potential community failures and analyze their impression earlier than they happen.

ManageEngine OpManager tracks useful resource consumption so I can optimize how bandwidth, CPU, and reminiscence are allotted. If sure gadgets use extra sources than they need to, customers can take corrective motion earlier than it impacts the remainder of the community. This proactive method helps cut back pointless bills, as customers can determine whether or not they want an improve or can optimize an present setup.

Whereas ManageEngine OpManager affords a variety of customization choices, deeper customizations usually require scripting. If I need to tailor the software program to fulfill particular wants, I’d have to jot down customized scripts, which could not be possible for somebody with out coding expertise. This may be irritating as a result of I anticipate a high-end community monitoring instrument to supply extra out-of-the-box customization with out requiring technical workarounds.

Whereas ManageEngine OpManager is designed for scalability, some customers report that it may well decelerate beneath very heavy workloads. If a community has hundreds of gadgets producing massive quantities of information, efficiency can endure, resulting in delays in alerts and reporting. This may be regarding as a result of velocity and responsiveness are vital in a monitoring answer. I wouldn’t need to depend on a system that lags most once I want real-time insights.

Whereas ManageEngine OpManager does supply reporting options, I’ve seen that the number of built-in report templates is considerably restricted. If I want particular stories that aren’t accessible by default, I both must create customized ones (which isn’t all the time intuitive) or search for third-party options.

What I dislike about ManageEngine OpManager:

• Whereas ManageEngine OpManager affords many customization choices, I’ve discovered that deeper customizations usually require scripting. If I need to tailor the software program to fulfill extremely particular monitoring wants, I’d have to jot down customized scripts, which isn’t all the time possible.
• Though ManageEngine OpManager is constructed for scalability, I’ve seen stories that efficiency can decelerate beneath heavy workloads. If a community consists of hundreds of gadgets producing massive quantities of information, the software program could begin experiencing delays in alerts and reporting.

What G2 customers dislike about ManageEngine OpManager:

“The pre-loaded machine templates within the instrument are very primary. ManageEngine ought to make investments extra in offering ready-to-use templates with the right information since distributors expose all obligatory info by means of their MIBs.

Moreover, the flexibility to create templates by way of REST APIs is at present nonexistent, regardless that many distributors are shifting towards APIs as the first methodology for information assortment. We now have to develop these templates from scratch utilizing customized scripts, which provides pointless complexity.”

– ManageEngine OpManager Evaluation, Verified Person in Data Know-how and Companies

I like how Site24x7 tracks endpoint occasions step-by-step. This degree of granularity is invaluable when diagnosing community points or pinpointing efficiency bottlenecks. Not like different monitoring instruments that present solely a high-level overview, Site24x7 permits me to see precisely the place delays happen. This characteristic helps customers troubleshoot complicated community environments with a number of dependencies. 

Managing a number of sources throughout a posh community could be overwhelming, however Site24x7 consolidates this right into a single platform. I wouldn’t have to leap between totally different instruments to observe servers, functions, and community gadgets. As an alternative of getting fragmented visibility, every thing is centralized, which may enhance response instances when a difficulty arises.

I recognize that Site24x7 affords a broader spectrum of monitoring providers, together with software and server efficiency. An all-in-one answer means I wouldn’t want extra software program to observe totally different IT infrastructure facets. That is notably helpful when managing large-scale IT environments the place totally different elements should work seamlessly.

Site24x7 appears to be actively bettering its options. The frequent updates recommend that the builders tackle buyer suggestions and keep on prime of rising monitoring wants. I wouldn’t need to put money into a instrument that turns into stagnant and fails to maintain up with new applied sciences. Common enhancements additionally imply the software program stays aggressive with different community monitoring options.

Common updates are normally good, however not after they introduce new points. Some customers have famous that Site24x7 has had issues the place updates brought on disruptions in efficiency or performance. That’s a significant concern as a result of I wouldn’t need to depend on a monitoring instrument that turns into unstable resulting from its updates.

Whereas Site24x7 affords a broad vary of options, some extra superior capabilities appear locked behind higher-tier plans. Meaning I may need to pay considerably extra to entry options that ought to be commonplace for community monitoring. The frustration is that whereas the core options could also be helpful, I’d have to judge whether or not the extra price is justifiable.

Some suggestions means that Site24x7’s alerting system isn’t all the time as efficient correctly. If alerts are too frequent, they will grow to be noise, inflicting customers to disregard them. However, if alerts aren’t well timed or well-prioritized, they will fail to catch vital points earlier than they escalate. I’d anticipate a monitoring instrument to supply a refined stability between actionable alerts and pointless notifications.

What I dislike about Site24x7:

• Frequent updates are normally good, however I’ve seen suggestions that Site24x7’s updates typically trigger system disruptions. I wouldn’t need to depend on a monitoring instrument that turns into unstable due to its updates.
• Whereas Site24x7 affords many helpful options, I don’t like that some superior capabilities are locked behind higher-tier pricing plans. It’s irritating to must pay additional for options that really feel important for community monitoring.

What G2 customers dislike about Site24x7:

“There appear to be a couple of bugs that sometimes add additional screens. These points are addressed rapidly, however they’re nonetheless regarding when working with a restricted variety of screens. Maxing out unexpectedly means I’ve to manually delete them or take away the bottom monitor and begin over. It’s not a dealbreaker, however it may be irritating.”

– Site24x7 Evaluation, Daniel M.

Want to monitor servers, functions, networks, databases, and extra? Strive one of the best enterprise monitoring software program.