Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
This week’s tragic taking pictures of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York has raised concern in regards to the safety of company leaders.
CNN says, “UnitedHealthcare CEO’s killing exhibits why firms spend thousands and thousands to guard their prime executives.” A Forbes columnist predicts that “after the taking pictures… safety personnel will probably be in demand.” And, in line with this Wall Avenue Journal report, his killing “prompted a right away re-evaluation of longstanding safety practices throughout company America,” and “dozens” of safety chiefs from massive U.S. firms convened collectively on a name to debate the scenario.
“The surroundings is explosive proper now,” a former Boston police commissioner who now (no shock) consults with massive firms on mitigating safety dangers instructed the Journal. “The threats are evolving and getting extra violent.”
Okay, let’s settle down, we could?
In fact, there’s purpose behind this concern. Company executives will not be solely extra within the highlight than ever earlier than, however they’re additionally not too laborious to search out. They attend public occasions, shareholder conferences and social features all around the world. Usually, firms make their schedules public or publish press releases noting the place they will be. Getting maintain of their residence addresses is just a few steps on-line. Digging into their private relationships takes minutes, because of LinkedIn, X and Fb.
When you’re a company government, you may simply be focused by somebody who, say, needs to proper a improper or impersonate a social justice warrior for quarter-hour of fame. However this isn’t a brand new factor, is it?
Uber’s former CEO, Travis Kalanick, was egged in Taiwan in 2017. Invoice Gates was hit with a pie within the face throughout an abroad go to in 1998. Rubert Murdoch and the CEOs of Qantas Airways and the now defunct Enron Company additionally acquired pie-ed. Frankly, plenty of enterprise leaders and celebrities have been “involuntarily” pied through the years.
However the homicide of a CEO is, clearly, rather more critical. Fortunately, these conditions haven’t solely been few and much between however nearly non-existent.
An promoting government was murdered in New Jersey in 1994, however that turned out to be the Unabomber’s doing. A Microsoft government was shot and killed in Florida in 2022, however the wrongdoer turned out to be his ex-wife’s husband. George Tiller, who owned a ladies’s well being clinic in Kansas, was murdered by an anti-abortion extremist at a church service (his clinic was the goal of “a number of assaults” beforehand).
I do not wish to downplay or trivialize the gravity of what occurred to Thompson. However I’ve searched Google and numerous chatbots like Perplexity and ChatGPT for examples of different CEOs who’ve met the identical destiny and are available up quick.
There are at present 55,000 publicly held firms on the earth, and the U.S. has greater than six million employee-owned companies alone. These firms are led not solely by CEOs and enterprise homeowners however by groups of senior executives who would all make attractive targets for the eye seeker. And but, there are very, only a few incidents like this. Senior executives appear extra prone to succumbing to a snowboarding accident or happening in a airplane crash than some random individual taking pictures them level clean on a busy New York Metropolis road.
Which is why we must always all settle down for a minute. The media loves to use the worst of our fears and anxieties to get clicks. In order that they write issues like “safety will probably be in demand” and “the surroundings is explosive.” Posts like these from irresponsible “journalists” actually don’t assist both. It is a terrific advertising and marketing second for safety companies. However ought to firms be making knee-jerk selections to all-of-the-sudden begin spending vital sums for safety over what appears to be an remoted incident? In case your CEO is Mark Zuckerberg, a star, I get it. However for all others? I am not so certain.
Associated: This is How Entrepreneurs Can Defend Their Firm From Cyberattacks
Why? As a result of individuals do not go round taking pictures different individuals. Our techniques — whereas they do not catch everybody — are fairly good at isolating these with prison histories or who want watching. Weapons will be obtained each legally and illegally, however pulling off a taking pictures requires persistence, ability and planning.
In fact, individuals in public positions must be cautious in at the moment’s world. CEOs who get political or concerned in social points or help sure controversial causes are growing their threat of assault from a tiny fraction of lunatics that oppose them. Executives who run companies which can be concerned in life and dying issues, similar to healthcare, additionally must be cautious. All leaders have to concentrate on their environment. In the event that they obtain threats — as Thompson allegedly did — they need to take them critically. These are the conditions the place added safety measures are wanted, be it offered by native police or by non-public companies.
However as you may see from the numbers, these conditions are few and much between. So, nobody must be panicking. Companies needn’t encompass their CEOs with secret service-type brokers in sun shades. Some do, and so they pay thousands and thousands for the privilege. However for the overwhelming majority of company executives, they’ll take coronary heart that we have not gotten to that time. And I do not suppose we’ll ever get to that time — not less than not within the foreseeable future.
Thompson’s taking pictures was tragic. However it was a uncommon occasion. An anomaly. We should always mourn for this man. However, with apologies to the safety business, we should not be overreacting.