My 6 Picks for the Greatest Enterprise Threat Administration Software program

I’ve at all times believed chaos is only a signal of a lacking system.

So, after I began noticing how usually threat exhibits up quietly in delayed approvals, compliance critiques, or sudden dependencies, it received me pondering: how do enterprise groups keep forward of all this with out getting buried in it?

That curiosity led me to discover how corporations handle threat at scale. Not from a distance however by digging into the software program that helps them observe points, preserve compliance, and make sooner, extra knowledgeable choices.

To put in writing this information on the greatest enterprise threat administration software program, I reviewed suggestions on 20+ platforms, specializing in how effectively they deal with threat identification, real-time reporting, compliance workflows, automation, and cross-functional visibility.

Beneath are the six instruments that stood out for his or her readability, flexibility, and talent to assist groups transfer ahead with out second-guessing what may go incorrect.

Why these are the most effective enterprise threat administration software program

It’s simple to imagine threat administration is all about compliance, however the extra I explored, the extra I spotted it’s actually about readability. Readability in decision-making, accountability, and how briskly a enterprise can reply when one thing doesn’t go as deliberate.

That’s what I stored in thoughts whereas evaluating these instruments. I wasn’t simply on the lookout for software program that might observe dangers. I paid shut consideration to how every handles complexity with out turning into a part of the issue. Did customers say it surfaced the appropriate data on the proper time? Might it adapt to totally different frameworks? Was it serving to groups work collectively or slowing them down?

Some instruments checked all of the packing containers however nonetheless got here off as inflexible. Others supplied loads of flexibility however lacked the construction groups wanted to scale. Those that stood out primarily based on what I discovered in consumer critiques balanced each standards, which earned them a spot on this listing.

What I appeared for in the most effective ERM software program

I thought-about the next components when evaluating the most effective enterprise threat administration software program.

• Centralized threat visibility: A transparent, consolidated view of dangers throughout enterprise models is on the coronary heart of any sturdy ERM platform. I prioritized instruments that made it simple to map and categorize dangers, hyperlink them to controls, and monitor them in actual time. Bonus factors if the platform supported heatmaps, threat scoring, and clear possession assignments.
• Automated compliance and audit workflows: Manually managing frameworks like SOX, ISO 31000, or GDPR is a big time sink. I appeared intently at platforms that supplied built-in compliance workflows, doc administration, and automatic proof assortment for audits. One of the best instruments assist streamline management testing and make staying prepared for audit season year-round simpler.
• Assist for a number of threat varieties and frameworks: Each enterprise manages a mixture of dangers from operational and reputational to cyber and third-party. I evaluated how effectively every platform dealt with totally different threat classes and whether or not they supplied versatile, customizable frameworks to assist varied industries and use instances.
• Customization and scalability: I appeared for platforms that allowed tailor-made workflows, customized threat assessments, adaptable scoring fashions, and role-based permissions. One of the best enterprise threat administration software program scales up with organizational complexity with out turning into too inflexible or overwhelming.
• Cross-functional collaboration: Threat doesn’t sit in a silo; it touches each staff. I prioritized platforms that supported collaboration between threat, compliance, IT, authorized, finance, and ops.
• Integrations and information sharing: Whether or not pulling information from human sources data system (HRIS), GRC, vendor administration, or cybersecurity instruments, the most effective ERM software program shouldn’t function in a vacuum. I targeted on platforms that made connecting current techniques simple, automated information movement, and eradicated handbook entry throughout groups.
• Reporting and govt insights: I additionally paid shut consideration to reporting instruments. The strongest platforms delivered clear, customizable experiences that helped flip uncooked information into action-ready insights.

The listing under accommodates real consumer critiques from the ERM software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Catalog, assess, and mitigate business-specific dangers reminiscent of monetary or well being and security
• Present instruments to speak dangers to staff, clients, distributors, and suppliers
• Create, preserve, and implement company insurance policies and guidelines for inner and exterior use
• Keep an up-to-date repository of legal guidelines, rules, and business requirements
• Assist customers plan, implement, and observe the efficiency of audit packages and duties
• Guarantee enterprise continuity administration by means of incident administration and threat mitigation
• Ship coaching and studying for compliance functions, together with certifications
• Carry out third-party, vendor, and provider threat assessments and due diligence
• Assist a number of threat administration methodologies, reminiscent of quantitative and qualitative
• Collect and analyze environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information from varied sources

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.

AuditBoard is a threat and compliance platform that’s extensively used for inner audit, SOX, and enterprise threat administration. It’s designed to assist groups handle controls, observe documentation, and collaborate on audit workflows from one centralized house.

One of the crucial constant themes I seen in G2 critiques was how simple AuditBoard is to make use of. Reviewers repeatedly known as out its intuitive structure, clear UI, and the truth that even new staff members might discover their manner round with out a lot hand-holding. In comparison with extra inflexible GRC instruments, AuditBoard appears to decrease the barrier to getting began, particularly for management homeowners exterior the audit staff.

Audit administration was a frequent matter within the suggestions I reviewed. Customers talked about how useful the platform is for organizing testing, linking controls to dangers, and managing walkthroughs or proof in a single place. A number of reviewers appreciated that it streamlined their audit cycle and made collaboration between auditors, stakeholders, and exterior groups extra environment friendly.

Buyer assist was one other sturdy level throughout critiques. I seen a number of customers declaring how responsive and educated the assist staff is, notably throughout onboarding or when rolling out new options. Just a few even mentioned that gaining access to useful reps made the distinction between a rocky and a clean implementation.

That mentioned, not all the pieces is seamless. Whereas the interface will get excessive marks general, reviewers famous a studying curve with regards to among the extra superior or newer options. A number of talked about that documentation or coaching sources may very well be improved for groups scaling up or including extra modules.

One other theme that popped up within the critiques I evaluated was associated to syncing and integrations. A number of customers talked about points connecting AuditBoard with exterior instruments, primarily reporting or information visualization platforms. Some discovered the sync inconsistent, which created friction throughout audits or govt reporting cycles.

What I dislike about AuditBoard:

• I noticed fairly a number of reviewers point out that there’s a studying curve when rolling out newer options or modules.
• Syncing got here up as a recurring ache level, particularly for groups utilizing exterior reporting instruments. I think about the challenges of counting on these connections and never having them work constantly.

What G2 customers dislike about AuditBoard:

“AuditBoard doesn’t do the most effective with letting purchasers find out about points occurring inside their system which are impacting customers, and typically we solely discover out after we submit a service desk ticket. Examples embrace occasions after we couldn’t obtain our testing paperwork, and this was a identified challenge affecting a number of clients, but we didn’t study that this challenge was being labored on till after a ticket was submitted. Buyer assist does do effectively with working with you as soon as a ticket is submitted, which is constructive; I simply suppose they may very well be extra proactive.”

– AuditBoard Overview, Nick N.

Workiva is an enterprise platform identified for simplifying advanced reporting, compliance, and threat workflows. Finance, audit, and threat groups use it to handle controls, collaborate on paperwork, and align reporting with regulatory necessities.

One factor that got here by means of strongly within the G2 critiques I evaluated was how effectively Workiva handles reporting. Customers constantly known as out how simple it’s to hyperlink information, construct experiences, and preserve consistency throughout all the pieces from threat matrices to board-level summaries. In response to G2 suggestions, the platform appears notably well-suited for big groups that have to maintain all the pieces audit-ready with out chasing spreadsheets.

Collaboration was one other main energy throughout the critiques I appeared by means of. Groups talked about that it’s simple to work on reside paperwork, assign duties, and maintain communication centralized, whether or not managing a quarterly report or a full enterprise threat evaluate. Primarily based on what I learn, that cross-functional transparency is an enormous win for threat groups that don’t function in a silo.

Reviewers additionally usually described Workiva as their “single supply of fact.” I noticed a number of mentions of model management, information linking, and the power to keep away from duplicate work throughout groups. That reliability appears particularly beneficial in enterprise environments the place one misstep in documentation can create downstream dangers.

Nonetheless, a number of reviewers flagged a studying curve, particularly throughout onboarding or configuring extra superior workflows. For groups new to ERM software program or these with out devoted platform assist, it might take time to get completely in control.

I additionally got here throughout a number of critiques that described the setup as time-consuming. Whereas the platform clearly has depth, some customers felt the implementation effort was heavier than anticipated, particularly when managing a number of frameworks or migrating from legacy techniques.

What I dislike about Workiva:

• A number of critiques talked about the educational curve, particularly for brand spanking new customers. I think about establishing advanced workflows would take time with out sturdy assist.
• I additionally noticed feedback in regards to the setup course of feeling heavier than anticipated. If I had been rolling it out company-wide, I’d need to plan for this upfront.

What G2 customers dislike about Workiva:

“Fairly often, connection may be very sluggish. There are options to be improved reminiscent of – formulation, pivots. Additionally, there isn’t any present strategy to share paperwork with an enormous group of individuals with out giving entry to every one to Workiva – for instance, a gaggle of 10000 individuals inside one group.”

– Workiva Overview, Kristian T.

Scrut Automation is a compliance and threat administration platform designed to assist corporations simplify their audit readiness processes throughout frameworks like ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR. It’s particularly in style with fast-growing groups seeking to exchange handbook monitoring with one thing extra structured and automatic.

As I learn by means of G2 critiques, one factor that got here up usually was how simple Scrut is to make use of. Reviewers described the platform as clear, easy, and easy to navigate. It helps groups keep engaged with no need lengthy onboarding classes.

Automation additionally stood out throughout the critiques I checked out (it is within the title). Scrut helps streamline recurring duties like proof assortment, threat assessments, and management testing. A number of customers talked about how a lot time it saved their groups throughout audits and inner critiques, particularly in comparison with doing all the pieces manually.

The platform’s built-in assist for frameworks like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 was one other sturdy theme. Primarily based on consumer suggestions, Scrut appears to return pre-configured with a number of what groups have to get began: insurance policies, controls, and process templates, so that they’re not constructing their packages from scratch.

Some reviewers identified that Scrut’s threat administration options aren’t as versatile as they’d like. Just a few famous challenges in categorizing dangers or adapting frameworks to their particular organizational setup.

I additionally seen a handful of critiques mentioning occasional slowness or bugs within the UI. If you happen to’re managing excessive volumes of knowledge, that’s one thing to bear in mind.

What I dislike about Scrut Automation:

• Some reviewers mentioned the danger administration options weren’t as versatile or constructed out as different areas. If I had been working a extra advanced ERM program, I’d need to discover that fastidiously.
• I additionally noticed a number of feedback about occasional bugs or sluggish load occasions. It’s not a dealbreaker, however I’d need to ensure efficiency stays constant over time.

What G2 customers dislike about Scrut Automation:

“At occasions, there’s a delay in syncing modifications inside Google Workspace (Gsuite), reminiscent of newly added staff, So it creates confusion as to why my worker depend is displaying much less.”

– Scrut Automation Overview, Sandeep S.

Hyperproof helps organizations handle threat, streamline compliance, and keep audit-ready throughout a number of frameworks. It’s usually utilized by groups navigating SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and different requirements, with a robust give attention to proof administration and ongoing monitoring.

As I reviewed G2 suggestions, I seen how usually Hyperproof was praised for supporting a number of compliance frameworks in a single place. Customers shared that it helped them scale back duplicate work by centralizing controls, linking proof, and reusing documentation throughout audits. For groups juggling overlapping necessities, the pliability right here makes an actual distinction.

Proof assortment was additionally a standard energy theme. In response to the critiques I combed by means of, the platform makes it simple to assign duties, add proof, and observe audit progress with out continuously checking in throughout groups. It’s particularly useful when deadlines are tight, or audits are occurring concurrently.

One thing else that stood out was how usually customers talked about the Hyperproof staff itself. I noticed a number of critiques calling out proactive onboarding, quick assist responses, and common check-ins from buyer success reps. For a product this deep, that form of partnership could make or break the expertise.

There have been, nonetheless, some mentions of a studying curve. Just a few customers famous that it took time to totally perceive how one can arrange packages or unlock the platform’s full potential, extra so for groups managing advanced threat situations.

Customization limitations additionally got here up in critiques, notably round dashboards and templates. Some customers felt restricted in how a lot they might tailor the interface to suit their inner workflows or reporting preferences.

What I dislike about Hyperproof:

• A number of customers famous a studying curve, particularly throughout early implementation. I’d in all probability desire a strong onboarding plan in place to benefit from it.
• I additionally got here throughout suggestions about restricted dashboard customization. If you wish to get extremely tailor-made views or experiences, you will need to affirm what’s doable upfront.

What G2 customers dislike about Hyperproof:

“The dashboard lacks customization choices, and the interior reporting function falls in need of expectations, as it’s also non-customizable. Hyperproof’s recommended answer is to make use of Snowflake integration to extract information and generate experiences. Moreover, a customizable, template-based questionnaire for assessments is just not accessible.”

– Hyperproof Overview, Sathish S.

Fusion Framework System is constructed for threat and resilience groups managing advanced operations, incidents, and continuity planning. Massive enterprises use it to centralize threat processes and put together for potential disruptions.

Throughout the G2 critiques I examined, threat administration constantly emerged as a robust level. Customers shared how Fusion helps them keep on high of threat assessments, observe mitigation efforts, and reply sooner when points come up. Just a few talked about that having a centralized view helped their groups higher align priorities throughout departments.

Enterprise continuity and catastrophe restoration had been additionally generally talked about within the suggestions I reviewed. Many customers mentioned how Fusion helps doc response plans, assign roles, and simulate situations, strengthening groups’ operational resilience. It appears to supply the form of construction wanted when preparation can’t afford to be reactive.

I additionally seen a number of reviewers commenting on how approachable the platform feels as soon as it’s up and working. Customers described the interface as adaptable, notably when configuring dashboards or navigating day-to-day workflows.

That mentioned, attending to that time takes some effort. I got here throughout a number of critiques that point out a steep studying curve throughout implementation, particularly when establishing extremely personalized packages.

Buyer assist got here up in a number of critiques as an space that might enhance. Whereas not a dealbreaker, some customers mentioned they’d’ve appreciated extra hands-on assist throughout rollout or when troubleshooting particular use instances.

What I dislike about Fusion Framework System:

• A number of customers described the educational curve as steeper than anticipated. Earlier than diving in, I’d need to be sure that there is a clear implementation plan in place.
• Just a few critiques talked about assist may very well be extra proactive. If I had been managing a time-sensitive rollout, I’d need to double-check the extent of assist accessible.

What G2 customers dislike about Fusion Framework System:

“An space that Fusion Framework System might take into account revising is the graphical consumer interface as a result of it’s reasonably medley to novice customers. This has made the educational technique of the staff sluggish and required extra coaching to get aware of and make the most of all of the options of the app. Furthermore, the software program has just about each setting adjustable, with their administration time-consuming and typically requiring professional-level data. Such components have at occasions restricted skill to totally unlock worth from the software program capabilities as desired.”

– Fusion Framework System Overview, Martin B.

IBM OpenPages permits organizations to handle advanced threat, compliance, and audit workflows. It’s constructed for scale, with deep performance throughout threat domains and integrations with IBM’s AI and information platforms.

One of the crucial constant patterns I noticed in G2 critiques was OpenPages’ energy in threat administration. Customers shared that it helped them construct structured workflows for figuring out, assessing, and monitoring dangers throughout their organizations. A number of reviewers famous that it was instrumental in extremely regulated industries the place threat oversight must be hermetic.

One other standout function throughout the critiques I learn was the integration with IBM Watson. In response to customers, the platform leverages pure language processing to automate duties like reviewing insurance policies, parsing documentation, or figuring out dangers from unstructured information. That AI-driven method appears to set OpenPages aside from extra conventional GRC techniques.

There have been additionally indicators that OpenPages can assist a variety of threat varieties. Whereas reviewers didn’t at all times listing them out immediately, I noticed mentions of modules for third-party threat administration, incident monitoring, coverage administration, and audit workflows. Primarily based on what I learn, it feels versatile sufficient to adapt to totally different threat features relying on the group’s wants.

All mentioned and accomplished, OpenPages isn’t one thing most groups can roll out in a single day. A number of critiques referenced a posh implementation course of that required sturdy inner alignment and assist from IBM to get it proper. It’s highly effective however clearly constructed for corporations with the sources to handle a large-scale deployment.

Value got here up a number of occasions as effectively. Whereas reviewers didn’t name it out as a serious challenge, a number of talked about that the worth level and useful resource necessities is likely to be higher suited to massive enterprises than mid-sized groups.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:

• Implementation appears like a venture in itself. Earlier than taking it on, I’d need to guarantee we had the appropriate inner assist.
• Value wasn’t the largest grievance, however it did come up. For a mid-sized enterprise, I’d in all probability have to weigh the long-term worth in opposition to the preliminary funding.

What G2 customers dislike about IBM OpenPages:

“The Value is excessive as in comparison with different GRC instruments, and there are some hurdles in consumer adoption.”

– IBM OpenPages Overview, Vishal D.

It is dependent upon what your staff wants, however primarily based on my analysis of G2 critiques, AuditBoard and Workiva constantly stand out. AuditBoard is praised for its user-friendly interface and robust audit capabilities, making it an awesome match for inner audit groups. Workiva excels in reporting and cross-team collaboration, particularly in regulated industries.

2. What’s the greatest enterprise threat administration software program for banks?

For banking and monetary providers, IBM OpenPages and Workiva are two sturdy decisions. OpenPages is designed for enterprise-scale implementations and helps sturdy threat modeling, compliance monitoring, and integration with IBM Watson for automation. Workiva, alternatively, presents glorious real-time reporting and model management, which is efficacious for regulatory reporting and audit readiness in monetary establishments.

3. What are some ERM instruments for insurance coverage corporations?

Primarily based on what I’ve seen in G2 critiques, insurance coverage corporations may take into account a number of instruments: Fusion Framework System for continuity planning and incident response, AuditBoard for audit and compliance administration, and Hyperproof for proof monitoring and multi-framework compliance. These platforms supply totally different strengths relying on how your insurance coverage staff constructions threat and compliance internally.

4. Which ERM instruments are greatest for compliance automation?

Scrut Automation, Hyperproof, and Workiva are all strong picks for groups seeking to streamline compliance. Scrut stands out for its pre-built assist for ISO 27001 and SOC 2, whereas Hyperproof makes it simple to handle a number of frameworks with out duplicating work. Workiva ties automation on to reporting and audit documentation, which is useful for recurring compliance cycles.

5. Which enterprise threat administration instruments supply the most effective reporting options?

Workiva is steadily praised for its real-time reporting, govt dashboards, and information linking throughout groups. It’s useful for organizations that have to current clear, audit-ready insights to management or exterior stakeholders.

Dangerous enterprise? Not anymore

Managing threat doesn’t should imply limitless spreadsheets and crossed fingers. One of the best enterprise threat administration software program helps groups keep aligned, audit-ready, and a step forward.

From simplifying proof assortment to mapping dangers throughout frameworks, the instruments I’ve reviewed right here replicate what actual customers really worth. I’ve combed by means of the suggestions to floor what works (and what doesn’t) so you’ll be able to spend much less time evaluating platforms and extra time constructing a program that works.

Additionally managing vendor threat? Discover the greatest third-party and provider threat administration software program to remain forward of provider points and exterior dependencies.