I Examined 8 Finest Digital Signature Software program: Outcomes Inside

It began after I was buried beneath a mountain of paperwork that wanted signatures—quick. My inbox was flooded with contract requests, approval types, and freelancer agreements. I used to be printing, signing, scanning, and emailing backwards and forwards like I used to be caught in a time warp from 2005. It wasn’t simply time-consuming—it was downright exhausting.

After one notably chaotic day, I noticed one thing needed to change. I wanted a method to simplify this course of, and getting the greatest e-signature software program appeared like the right answer. 

Nevertheless, with so many instruments promising to “revolutionize” workflows, I didn’t wish to decide the primary one which got here up in a Google search. I wished the very best digital signature software program for my wants—one which mixed simplicity, safety, and effectivity.

So, I did what any curious particular person would do: I dove headfirst into analysis and testing. Over the previous few months, I’ve explored dozens of e-signature instruments, placing them by way of their paces to see how they stack up. I examined all the pieces—from consumer interfaces and integrations to pricing and buyer help. I even tried signing actual contracts with them to see how they match into my each day workflows.

Now, I’m right here to share my findings. Whether or not you’re operating a enterprise, managing a workforce, or simply in search of a device to make life just a little simpler, I’ve received you lined. These are the 8 greatest e-signature software program I’ve personally examined and chosen after attempting 30+ options. 

8 greatest e-signature software program I like to recommend

After I first began exploring e-signature software program, I wasn’t certain what to anticipate. I imply, what precisely makes one e-signature app higher than one other? 

At its core, e-signature software program permits me to signal paperwork electronically. But it surely’s not nearly including a squiggly line to a PDF—it’s about guaranteeing that my signature is safe, legally binding, and extremely simple to execute.

For me, the actual magic of those instruments lies of their skill to facilitate your complete document-signing course of. As a substitute of printing, signing, scanning, and emailing, I can signal or request a digital signature with only a few clicks. And it’s not restricted to my finish—these instruments make it simply as seamless for the opposite social gathering to signal, irrespective of the place they’re.

I additionally love how e-signature software program provides layers of safety and verification. Many platforms use encryption, audit trails, and identification authentication to make sure your signed paperwork meet authorized requirements. Which means whether or not you are signing a contract, closing a deal, or onboarding a brand new rent, you may relaxation assured that the method will stand as much as scrutiny.

By the top of my testing, I had a transparent sense of which instruments excelled and which fell brief, giving me a stable basis to suggest the very best choices.

What makes the very best e-signature software program price it? My evaluation

After I began testing e-signature software program, I assumed the selection would come down to some easy options—how simple it was to signal a doc, how rapidly I might ship one, and possibly the worth tag. However as I dug deeper, I noticed that the very best instruments do far more than simply change a pen.

With all that in thoughts, I got down to establish the components that really separate the good instruments from the mediocre ones. Right here’s what I discovered to be a very powerful:

• Consumer expertise: The very best digital signature software program is designed with the top consumer in thoughts. The method ought to be intuitive from the second you add a doc to the purpose it’s signed. I appeared for clear, simple interfaces that didn’t require a tutorial. Drag-and-drop performance for including signature fields was an enormous plus, as was the power to preview and regulate paperwork earlier than sending.
• Safety and compliance: Safety isn’t negotiable when coping with legally binding paperwork. I paid shut consideration to instruments that supplied encryption protocols (like AES-256), strong authentication choices (two-factor authentication, identification verification), and detailed audit trails. Compliance with authorized requirements like eIDAS, ESIGN, and UETA was one other must-have, guaranteeing signatures are legitimate and enforceable in courtroom.
• Doc workflow automation: Signing is only one a part of the puzzle—getting paperwork to the proper individuals and monitoring their standing is equally necessary. I evaluated how effectively the instruments dealt with sending paperwork to a number of signers, setting signing orders, and sending automated reminders. The power to create reusable templates for incessantly signed paperwork saved much more time.
• Integration capabilities: An excellent e-signature device ought to match seamlessly into your present workflows. I examined how simply these platforms built-in with apps I already use, like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Dropbox, and Slack. API entry for customized integrations was a bonus for groups with extra advanced wants.
• Pace and efficiency: No one has time to attend for sluggish uploads or laggy interfaces. I seen how rapidly paperwork have been uploaded, processed, and despatched, even with giant information. I additionally examined the platforms’ responsiveness throughout busy intervals, like sending out a number of contracts concurrently.
• Customized branding choices: Sustaining a constant model picture is necessary for professionals and companies. I appeared for instruments that allowed customized branding, similar to including logos, colours, and customized e mail templates to make the signing expertise really feel polished {and professional}.
• Superior options: Some instruments supplied superior choices like bulk sending for a number of recipients, in-person signing (assume tablets at occasions), and conditional logic to customise workflows. Whereas not important for everybody, these options may be splendid for particular use instances.

The record under accommodates real consumer critiques from G2’s e-signature class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Permit each sender and recipient customers to signal paperwork on quite a lot of units and working programs
• Encrypt and safe communications and shared paperwork between the customers of the answer
• Observe doc standing and notify customers when actions are required (signal, approve, and so forth.)
• Allow customers to outline consumer roles and permission rights internally and for exterior customers (contractors, companions, clients, and so forth.)
• Supply built-document creation and storage capabilities or combine with third-party software program options that present doc creation or storage options

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.  

When managing digital signatures, DocuSign is commonly the primary title that involves thoughts—and for good motive. 

DocuSign makes signing paperwork ridiculously simple. Whether or not on my laptop computer or utilizing the cell app, it’s a matter of some clicks to add, add signature fields, and ship a doc off for signing. The consumer interface is clear and intuitive; even first-timers can determine it out with out a lot effort. I particularly recognize how seamless it’s to trace the progress of a doc—you’ll know precisely when it’s been seen, signed, and accomplished.

One other factor I really like about DocuSign is how dependable it feels. It complies with authorized requirements like eIDAS, ESIGN, and UETA, which implies the signatures are legally binding and safe. In addition they present detailed audit trails, so you will have all the mandatory proof in a single place if there is a dispute.

One standout characteristic is the bulk ship functionality, which lets me concurrently ship the identical doc to a number of recipients. This characteristic is ideal for large-scale agreements or onboarding processes. One other hidden gem is the sensible sections characteristic, which dynamically adjusts paperwork based mostly on recipient enter, making advanced types simpler to handle.

The mixing choices are one other large plus. DocuSign works effectively with the platforms I exploit, making it simple to drag paperwork from wherever they’re saved and ship them for signing with out switching between apps. 

I’ve used DocuSign extensively, and whereas it has loads of standout options, it’s not with out its quirks. One of many largest downsides is its pricing. Whereas it gives highly effective options, the fee can add up rapidly, particularly when you want superior choices like bulk sending or customized branding. For smaller companies or freelancers, this would possibly really feel like a stretch.

One other space the place DocuSign falls brief is in search and group. Discovering particular signed paperwork may be extra cumbersome than it ought to be. Whereas user-friendly general, the interface may gain advantage from higher doc group instruments.

I’ve additionally encountered just a few technical hiccups. On uncommon events, the system glitches—errors when importing information or delays in processing signatures. It’s not a dealbreaker, however it may be irritating, particularly when working in opposition to a decent deadline.

What I dislike about Docusign:

• I felt like discovering particular signed paperwork was extra cumbersome than it ought to be. A extra strong tagging and search characteristic would go a great distance in enhancing doc administration.
• Sometimes, I’ve encountered system errors, like points importing information or delays in processing signatures. Whereas not frequent, these glitches have been disruptive throughout time-sensitive duties.

What G2 customers dislike about Docusign:

“Paperwork voiding out is the one subject I’ve with the method. I do know that paperwork can’t keep open without end, however I do not get any sort of notification that my doc is about to run out like subs obtain when their doc is about to run out, so that might be useful, in my view.”

– Docusign Evaluation, Jennifer E.

Adobe Acrobat is a heavyweight within the e-signature area, combining its famend PDF instruments with a sturdy suite of signing options. It’s a platform constructed for professionals who want greater than only a signature device—it’s an all-in-one answer for managing paperwork seamlessly and securely.

What I really like about Adobe Acrobat for e-signatures is how polished {and professional} the method feels. Sending paperwork for signatures is extremely simple, whether or not I’m working from my desktop or cell app. I can add signature fields, customise workflows, and even accumulate a number of signatures in a selected order. The guided signing expertise ensures recipients know precisely the place to signal, decreasing errors and back-and-forths.

Integration with different instruments permits me to drag a file instantly from cloud storage, add signature fields, and ship it out in only a few clicks. It’s additionally nice for groups—collaborating on paperwork, setting permissions, and monitoring progress is constructed proper into the platform.

Safety is one other space the place Acrobat shines. I really like that I can lock delicate paperwork with passwords and even redact confidential data instantly within the PDF. And with regards to e-signatures, each motion is meticulously logged in an in depth audit path, so there’s by no means any doubt in regards to the doc’s authenticity.

After all, no device is ideal, and Acrobat has its quirks. For one, the sheer depth of options can really feel daunting at first. It’s highly effective, however getting on top of things took me a while. Additionally, the pricing is likely to be a sticking level for some. Whereas the options are price it, the subscription can really feel steep when you solely use the fundamentals. 

Lastly, whereas the cell app is useful, it’s not fairly as easy for duties like textual content edits or working with extra intricate paperwork.

What I dislike about Adobe Acrobat:

• Studying to navigate all of the superior options took me some time. Whereas highly effective, the sheer variety of instruments can really feel overwhelming for a brand new consumer like me.
• I discovered the cell app useful, however it doesn’t provide the identical easy expertise because the desktop model. Modifying textual content or working with advanced paperwork on a smaller display screen may be irritating.

What G2 customers dislike about Adobe Acrobat:

“Adobe Acrobat may be fairly costly, particularly for particular person customers or small companies. The subscription mannequin won’t enchantment to everybody. Adobe Acrobat may be demanding on system assets, which could have an effect on the efficiency of different purposes operating concurrently.”

– Adobe Acrobat Evaluation, Raj A.

PandaDoc utterly remodeled how I handle my e-signature. It’s a dynamic device that accelerates proposals, quotes, contracts, and extra workflows. I’ve used it extensively, and what units it aside isn’t simply its ease of use and talent to adapt to various signing situations whereas preserving the method safe {and professional}.

One characteristic I completely depend on is PandaDoc’s sequential signing functionality. This lets me arrange workflows the place a number of signers should register a selected order. It’s been a lifesaver when coping with contracts or approvals that want hierarchical sign-offs. With only a few clicks, I can make sure that every social gathering receives the doc on the proper stage, eliminating the confusion of dealing with parallel signers.

The auto-reminders for pending signatures are tremendous helpful for me. As soon as a doc is shipped, PandaDoc screens it for you, robotically nudging signers who haven’t accomplished their half. I not have to comply with up manually with stakeholders, which saves me time and retains my workflows transferring easily.

What I additionally love about PandaDoc is its embedded signing characteristic. After I was a freelancer, I built-in this into my web site for consumer agreements, permitting customers to signal instantly on the web page without having to obtain or e mail paperwork. It’s a seamless expertise that makes me look extremely polished {and professional}.

One other standout characteristic is its skill to deal with multi-language help for e-signatures. I labored with purchasers throughout completely different areas, and PandaDoc allowed me to ship paperwork of their most well-liked language, full with localized signing directions. It’s a small element that goes a great distance in making a client-friendly expertise.

Regardless of its strengths, PandaDoc isn’t with out drawbacks. The signer authentication choices could possibly be extra strong—whereas e mail verification works effectively, I’d like to see further layers like SMS or biometric authentication for even better safety. Moreover, whereas the embedded signing characteristic is implausible, setting it up initially required some technical know-how, which is likely to be a hurdle for non-developers.

Moreover, whereas the analytics are detailed, they fall brief in customizable reporting, limiting deeper information evaluation. The pricing construction will also be a hurdle for smaller groups or rare customers. The fee feels justified for energy customers however would possibly deter those that don’t want all of the superior options.

What I dislike about PandaDoc:

• I’d like to see extra choices for added safety past e mail verification, like SMS codes or biometric authentication.
• Whereas I appreciated the characteristic of embedded signing, setting it up as a brand new consumer was barely difficult for me with out technical experience.

What G2 customers dislike about PandaDoc:

“I feel the draw back of this one is once we want the signature in the midst of the field. Some customers can draw the signature, however the placement is usually under and above the road or field. To be added characteristic have to be: when a consumer tries to signal the docs and click on settle for and signal after that signature have to be robotically in the midst of the field to be extra user-friendly to a number of the senior and never savvy.”

– PandDoc Evaluation, John Wayne N.

Having transitioned from freelancing to working as a content material marketer, I’ve come to worth instruments that simplify processes with out shedding the private contact. Jotform Signal stands out as a result of it combines simplicity with flexibility, providing options that cater to customized workflows and dynamic signing experiences. It’s not simply one other e-signature platform—it’s a customizable answer that adapts to how I work.

One characteristic I discover genuinely distinctive is Jotform Signal’s interactive paperwork. Not like static PDFs, I can create agreements or proposals the place signers could make selections—like choosing pricing choices or confirming particulars—that robotically tailor the remainder of the doc. It’s like giving purchasers management whereas preserving all the pieces skilled.

One other standout is the auto-population from types. As a part of the Jotform ecosystem, I can collect consumer or vendor data by way of a Jotform type and feed that information instantly into an settlement. This has been invaluable for campaigns requiring detailed consumer enter, turning guide information entry into an automatic, time-saving course of.

For event-based work, Jotform Signal’s kiosk mode for in-person signing is a characteristic I’ve come to understand. It permits me to gather signatures throughout occasions utilizing a pill or shared machine without having paper types. That is notably useful for gathering approvals or waivers at in-person campaigns or workshops.

Safety-wise, Jotform Signal excels with multi-factor authentication (MFA) for delicate paperwork. I can require e mail and SMS verification for added safety, which provides me peace of thoughts when dealing with confidential agreements. Moreover, the doc model historical past ensures I can monitor each edit and model of a contract, stopping any confusion or disputes down the road.

On the draw back, Jotform Signal’s dependency on the Jotform ecosystem would possibly really feel limiting for some. Whereas the combination with Jotform Types is highly effective, customers who don’t want form-building options would possibly discover it pointless. 

One other disadvantage is the restricted offline capabilities—the device depends closely on an web connection, making it much less splendid for distant work in areas with poor connectivity. 

Lastly, whereas the interactive paperwork are implausible, creating extremely personalized variations requires some effort upfront, which could not be splendid for fast turnarounds.

What I dislike about Jotform Signal:

• The device shines when paired with Jotform Types, however some options may appear pointless when you don’t want form-building.
• With restricted offline help, an web connection is important for utilizing Jotform Signal, which may be inconvenient for distant or on-the-go work.

What G2 customers dislike about Jotform Signal:

“One space for enchancment in Jotform Signal is the customization choices for doc templates. Whereas it’s pretty simple to make use of, some design parts really feel restricted, particularly when matching particular branding or formatting wants. Moreover, although the platform is mostly intuitive, organising extra superior workflows can sometimes really feel much less streamlined, requiring further time and testing to make sure all the pieces works easily. Some additional steering or step-by-step tutorials for these advanced setups can be a helpful addition.”

– Jotform Evaluation, Rodolfo O.

Xodo Signal caught my consideration for its light-weight but feature-packed strategy to e-signatures. Its intuitive design and options make it an ideal match for anybody who must deal with doc signing rapidly and effectively with out getting slowed down by pointless complexity.

One among Xodo Signal’s standout options is its real-time collaboration functionality. Not like different e-signature instruments, this characteristic permits a number of individuals to concurrently evaluate, touch upon, and signal a doc. I’ve used it to lock approvals on contracts and agreements, and it’s utterly eliminated the effort of back-and-forth edits. Everybody can see updates in actual time, which retains the method transferring and ensures no miscommunication.

The customized signing hyperlink characteristic is one other game-changer for me. As a substitute of emailing particular person paperwork, I can generate a novel hyperlink and share it nonetheless I need—by way of textual content, chat, or perhaps a shared workforce platform. It’s fast and makes working with a number of signers in numerous places easy.

Xodo Signal additionally excels with its mobile-first strategy. The cell app is designed with ease of use in thoughts, permitting me to arrange, ship, and signal paperwork instantly from my telephone. Whether or not within the workplace or on the go, I can deal with contracts with out lacking a beat, and the expertise is simply as easy as utilizing the desktop model.

One other characteristic I depend on is doc locking after signing. As soon as a doc is signed, it’s robotically locked to forestall unauthorized adjustments, and an audit path tracks all exercise. It is a big plus for sustaining doc integrity and guaranteeing compliance with authorized requirements. The notification and reminder system can be price highlighting. Xodo Signal robotically follows up with signers who haven’t accomplished their half, which saves me time and ensures deadlines are met with out me having to nudge anybody manually.

That mentioned, there are just a few areas the place Xodo Signal might enhance. The template administration choices really feel a bit restricted. Whereas making a doc from scratch is simple, having higher instruments to arrange and reuse templates would save me much more time.

Moreover, whereas the cell app is nice for easy duties, modifying advanced paperwork with a number of fields can really feel restricted on smaller screens. The reporting options, whereas purposeful, might additionally provide extra customization and deeper insights into doc efficiency.

What I dislike about Xodo Signal:

• There aren’t any permissions for real-time collaboration. Everybody engaged on a doc can edit all fields, which may be dangerous for delicate sections restricted to particular collaborators.
• I want there have been further security measures like SMS codes or ID verification for high-security paperwork as an alternative of solely e mail verification.

What G2 customers dislike about Xodo Signal:

“The draw back of Xodo Signal is that if you’ll want to edit or replace a contract, it must be utterly canceled and resent. This generally confuses my purchasers who attempt to maintain utilizing the unique contract signal hyperlink. Irrespective of how small, the contract replace additionally counts as a totally new contract of their system. You can’t edit an uploaded contract doc. I additionally most well-liked the title Eversign over Xodo Signal. It went from a cool title to a wierd title.”

– Xodo Signal Evaluation, Mary A.

Dropbox Signal (previously HelloSign) gives a sensible and environment friendly strategy to e-signatures, making it an incredible selection for managing contracts and approvals. Its deep integration with Dropbox and simple instruments make doc signing and sharing fast and arranged, notably for these already aware of Dropbox.

One characteristic I’ve come to depend on is the role-based workforce administration. With Dropbox Signal, I can assign permissions to workforce members, management who can ship paperwork, and monitor progress throughout the workforce. This has been invaluable for collaborative workflows the place a number of individuals should contribute or approve earlier than a doc is finalized. It eliminates confusion and ensures accountability at each step.

The drag-and-drop editor is straightforward but efficient for making ready paperwork. Including signature fields, checkboxes, and dates is quick and doesn’t require a steep studying curve. I’ve used it to arrange agreements and contracts, customizing fields for particular signers with ease. This performance ensures that the proper fields are at all times assigned to the proper particular person.

What actually units Dropbox Signal aside is its direct integration with Dropbox. I can pull paperwork straight from my Dropbox folders, set them up for signing, and save the signed variations again into the identical folder robotically. This seamless integration retains all the pieces organized and ensures I by no means must waste time on uploads or downloads.

The request expiration characteristic is one other helpful device. Setting deadlines for signatures helps make sure that paperwork are signed promptly. It additionally sends automated reminders to signers, so I don’t have to fret about following up manually. This has stored my tasks on schedule with out requiring further effort.

That mentioned, there are just a few areas the place Dropbox Signal falls brief. The template library lacks options like tagging or folders for higher group, making managing a big assortment of reusable paperwork tough. Moreover, integration with cloud storage providers like Google Drive feels much less polished, which may disrupt workflows when you depend on a number of platforms.

One other disadvantage is the shortage of superior signer authentication choices—e mail verification is commonplace, however choices like SMS verification or ID checks aren’t out there, which can be a difficulty for extra delicate paperwork. 

Lastly, I’ve discovered the doc customization choices for branding minimal in comparison with different platforms. When you can add a emblem, it doesn’t permit for extra complete branding like personalized e mail templates or doc themes.

What I dislike about Dropbox Signal:

• Managing many templates with out higher categorization or tagging choices to enhance usability grew to become tough for me.
• The inconsistent integrations made it clunky for me to work with different platforms like Google Drive. This subject will decelerate workflows for customers with various storage wants.

What G2 customers dislike about Dropbox Signal:

“It could be good to see a bit faster which consumer and e mail handle was used for every doc being despatched out. There could also be a greater manner, however for now, I’ve to click on on each to see which paperwork are nonetheless out for signing and which one is for which consumer. It could even be good to have the ability to take away or add signers or change e mail addresses for signers after sending with out having to resend in full.”

– Dropbox Signal Evaluation, Dustin M.

Foxit eSign is far more than only a signature device—it’s designed for professionals who want safe, customizable, and environment friendly workflows to handle their agreements. From dealing with delicate contracts to managing workforce approvals, it gives superior e-signature capabilities tailor-made to fashionable enterprise wants.

One of many options I worth most is handwritten-style biometric signatures. Not like many instruments that persist with typed or image-based signatures, Foxit eSign permits signers to make use of touchscreen units to create genuine, handwritten signatures. This provides a private and legally binding contact that feels extra real for all events concerned.

One other standout characteristic is the collaborative evaluate course of. Earlier than finalizing a doc, I can share it with stakeholders for feedback, edits, and approvals. This ensures that everybody is aligned on the ultimate model earlier than signatures are added, decreasing the necessity for revisions after the actual fact.

Foxit eSign’s batch signature requests are perfect for bigger workflows. I’ve used this characteristic to concurrently ship a single doc to a number of recipients, monitoring their progress in actual time. It’s notably useful for onboarding new workforce members or managing multi-recipient agreements.

Time-stamped digital signatures add one other layer of safety and compliance. They embody exact timestamps from a trusted certificates authority, guaranteeing that signatures are verifiable and legally legitimate. This characteristic is very helpful for agreements that require time-sensitive authentication, similar to authorized or regulatory paperwork.

The template library is a time-saver for frequent workflows. I’ve created reusable templates with pre-configured fields for contracts, NDAs, and different generally used paperwork, making it fast to ship skilled, constant agreements with out ranging from scratch every time.

Whereas Foxit eSign is filled with highly effective options, there are areas the place it might enhance. The setup for digital certificates can really feel overly technical, requiring familiarity with encryption protocols and certificates authorities. 

The collaboration permissions are additionally restricted—as soon as a doc is shared for evaluate, there’s no method to limit modifying rights for particular sections, which is usually a concern for delicate supplies. 

Moreover, the educational curve for superior options is steeper than anticipated, and first-time customers may need for extra in-depth steering or tutorials.

What I dislike about Foxit eSign:

• My expertise of organising digital certificates and time-stamped signatures was barely difficult. It requires superior technical information, which can be intimidating for brand spanking new customers.
• Regardless of the intuitive interface, the educational curve for this device and all its options was steeper than most for me.

What G2 customers dislike about Foxit eSign:

“It’s regrettable that the notification settings are rigid if someone takes time to signal a doc at Foxit eSign. Generally, it looks like you could search an replace, which may be time-consuming. Additionally, there is a matter with doc importing that generally fails to acknowledge non-conventional file varieties and therefore has to have interaction in styling a number of the information. Such issues make the method barely much less easy than it could possibly be.

– Foxit eSign Evaluation, Barbara C.

Signaturely takes a no-frills strategy to e-signatures, specializing in simplicity whereas providing options designed to make doc signing accessible and environment friendly. Whether or not you are managing contracts, approval types, or easy agreements, it’s constructed to deal with important duties simply.

A characteristic I haven’t seen usually elsewhere is signer accessibility customization. Signaturely permits me to regulate the signing course of for recipients with completely different wants, similar to bigger signature bins or simplified signing flows. This has been notably useful when working with much less tech-savvy purchasers or stakeholders who want additional steering.

One other standout facet is the email-free signing possibility. For recipients who don’t use e mail incessantly, I can generate a signing hyperlink that may be shared by way of textual content or chat. This has made it extremely simple to achieve signers in unconventional situations, particularly when pace is essential.

Signaturely’s doc exercise monitoring gives granular insights. Past commonplace audit trails, it consists of time-stamped particulars on each interplay, like how lengthy a recipient spent on particular pages. This has helped me establish potential considerations, similar to purchasers hesitating over sure clauses, permitting me to handle points proactively.

One other nice characteristic is the collaborative signing stream. Signaturely permits a number of signers to work together with a doc in actual time, making it simple to finalize group agreements with out a number of rounds of back-and-forth.

One among my favourite options is its API integration for customized workflows. Signaturely may be embedded instantly into web sites or apps, enabling purchasers to signal contracts with out leaving the platform. That is excellent for companies providing providers like onboarding or occasion registration.

Nevertheless, Signaturely has limitations. For example, the template administration instruments are primary and lack organizational options like tagging or categorization. This will develop into irritating when working with a lot of templates. 

Moreover, whereas the email-free signing possibility is useful, it doesn’t provide monitoring for these hyperlinks except the doc is accomplished, making it tough to watch progress.

Lastly, bulk-sending choices are underwhelming. They lack the superior monitoring and customization options of competing platforms for managing a number of signers concurrently.

What I dislike about Foxit eSign:

• Whereas sending signing hyperlinks by way of textual content or chat is handy, the shortcoming to trace whether or not a recipient has accessed the doc till it’s signed creates pointless uncertainty.
• The shortage of built-in connections to common instruments like Salesforce or Trello has pressured me to depend on workarounds or guide processes for sure workflows, which slows me down.

What G2 customers dislike about Foxit eSign:

“Although Signaturely is already a stable product, there’s at all times one thing to enhance. I would like it in the event that they added automated reminders for pending signatures. Signers who may need forgotten the doc can be reminded, so the method would go quicker.

Whereas the present template choices are good, I would prefer to see extra customizable templates added. It could save lots of time for customers who work on comparable paperwork.”

– Foxit eSign Evaluation, Berhan T.

Integrating e-signature software program with ERP software program saves time and reduces errors. My workforce reviewed the greatest ERP programs that will help you make an knowledgeable resolution.