INQUIRER.web inventory picture
MANILA, Philippines — The Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Business (PCCI), the nation’s largest enterprise group, on Monday expressed its opposition to the P200 legislated wage hike being pushed in Congress, marking the most recent blowback from the personal sector after the Employers Confederation of the Philippines earlier objected to the proposal.
This developed because the Home of Representatives on Monday night time accepted on second studying the measure offering a P200 every day enhance for minimal wage employees within the personal sector.
READ: Home OKs P200 minimal wage hike invoice on 2nd studying
The draft invoice beforehand accepted by the Home committee on labor and employment, entitled “P200 Every day Throughout-the-Board Wage Improve Act,” was amended to point that the rise was just for low-income earners within the personal sector.
Lawmakers accepted by means of viva voce voting throughout plenary session Home Invoice No. 11376, or the proposed Wage Hike for Minimal Wage Staff Act.
Article continues after this commercial
It will exempt barangay micro enterprise enterprises and permit retail or service institutions repeatedly using no more than 10 employees in addition to institutions “adversely affected by pure calamities or human-induced disasters” to use for exemption.
Article continues after this commercial
For its half, the PCCI mentioned it considered the measure with “a lot concern” and urged lawmakers to go away it as much as the regional wage boards (RWBs) to find out wage changes.
“A blanket nationwide minimal wage doesn’t have in mind the variations in the price of residing throughout areas in addition to the distinctive wants of companies based mostly on particular trade, location, and sort of labor they want,” PCCI president Enunina Mangio mentioned in an announcement.
“Cities have greater prices of residing versus rural areas. Legislating a single wage for all areas can hurt companies in lower-cost areas and removes the flexibleness of the RWBs to set wages which might be aligned with the state of affairs of their native areas,” she identified.
Mangio added {that a} blanket minimal wage enhance may result in enterprise inefficiency and stagnation.
The PCCI official famous that whereas the wage hike might appear to be a step towards bettering the livelihood of employees, it may additionally result in greater labor prices, notably for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs).
“MSMEs are already working on tight margins. The mandated wage hike will drive these small enterprises to shoulder greater payroll bills,” Mangio mentioned.
“For some companies, notably these in low-margin industries like retail, hospitality and agri-food, the wage enhance will drive them to go on the price to customers,” she added.
Inflationary
Since this inflationary impact may additional erode the general public’s buying energy, she mentioned the wage enhance’s supposed profit can be negated on the added danger of decreasing jobs out there.
“Making on a regular basis objects dearer will merely offset the advantages of a better wage, particularly on employees within the low-income brackets. However the inflationary impact will bear down extra on employees within the casual sector who will not be certain by the minimal wage legislation,” she warned.
Mangio mentioned that there was additionally the chance of microenterprises within the formal sector shifting a few of their operations to the casual sector to chop prices.
“As a substitute of legislating wages, our coverage ought to have a complete method that balances the wants of employees with the capability of companies and be sure that MSMEs proceed to thrive whereas nonetheless offering honest wages,” she emphasised.
“For wage coverage to be significant, it ought to prioritize financial development and stability, enterprise productiveness, safe and high quality jobs, and actual buying energy for employees,” she added.
On Wednesday final week, Speaker Martin Romualdez dedicated that the Home would velocity up deliberations on a wage hike invoice, which might be the primary legislated wage enhance in 36 years.
Additional research wanted
Nevertheless, President Marcos, whereas acknowledging that employees had been fighting excessive costs, pointed to the RWB because the physique accountable for wage will increase.
“The factor is now we have a tripartite board that really determines the rise within the wage. So, we nonetheless have to check it additional to see how that may work collectively. As a result of this tripartite physique was additionally created by Congress… It’s their job to find out what the minimal wage ought to be,” he mentioned.
“Now we have to resolve the authorized points; now we have to resolve the financial points. So, it nonetheless deserves a substantial amount of research,” Mr. Marcos added.
The Nagkaisa (N1) Labor Coalition disagreed with the President’s view, noting that Congress’ delegating the facility to set minimal wages to the RWBs was not a hindrance to a legislated enhance.
“Congress by no means surrendered its plenary authority to legislate a nationwide minimal wage,” N1 chair Sonny Matula mentioned.
Matula, a labor lawyer, added that Mr. Marcos was “clearly uninformed” in calling for an extra research of the proposal, stating that the wage payments filed in Congress had undergone months of research and hearings attended by labor advocates and economists.
Your subscription couldn’t be saved. Please attempt once more.
Your subscription has been profitable.
The Senate already handed in February 2024 a invoice calling for a P100-daily minimal wage hike for personal sector employees. —with a report from Jerome Aning