Join Chalkbeat Indiana’s free day by day publication to maintain up with Indianapolis Public Faculties, Marion County’s township districts, and statewide schooling information.
The founding father of two shuttered digital constitution faculties used state funds meant for “underprivileged and at-risk” college students to make over $40,000 in marketing campaign contributions in 2018 to help Republican candidates, prosecutors allege in an ongoing federal legal case.
The federal case towards operators of Indiana Digital Faculty and Indiana Digital Pathways Academy is one among two that allege that Thomas Stoughton, the colleges’ founder, and different defendants defrauded thousands and thousands from the state by inflating pupil enrollment. Stoughton and different defendants additionally face a civil motion from the state legal professional common’s workplace over alleged fraud.
Federal prosecutors allege that Stoughton created numerous academic service suppliers to contract with the colleges’ organizer, the Indiana Digital Training Basis, to hide substantial quantities of cash that Stoughton paid himself, the colleges’ superintendent Percy Clark, and others affiliated with the colleges.
A kind of suppliers, Academic Innovation Analysis, LLC, allegedly paid $40,100 to political campaigns for 43 Republican candidates for the Indiana Basic Meeting, the Senate Majority Marketing campaign Committee, and the Home Republican Marketing campaign Committee within the three months main as much as the 2018 election, based on prosecutors.
“The aim of the political contributions was, in fact, to curry favor with state lawmakers who have been chargeable for college funding laws,” prosecutors stated in a Nov. 18 court docket submitting to introduce the contributions as proof within the trial. “Laws that the Defendants hoped to have amended in ways in which can be favorable to them.”
Stoughton didn’t reply to a request for remark left at a quantity listed for him, and his court-appointed legal professional for the federal prosecution — which the workplace of the U.S. Legal professional for the Southern District of Indiana initially filed a couple of yr in the past — declined to remark. Clark’s legal professional didn’t reply to a request for remark, and an individual who answered a quantity listed for Clark stated he was not current and repeatedly informed Chalkbeat to name again.
Clark has pleaded not responsible within the federal case. Stoughton is contesting the fees towards him, based on federal prosecutors.
The authorized actions observe a 2017 Chalkbeat investigation into the digital faculties that discovered ballooning enrollment figures, and in addition discovered that state funding went to a for-profit firm based by Stoughton. The political donations got here roughly a yr after that investigation, prosecutors say.
The 2 faculties closed in 2019, and in 2020 the Indiana State Board of Accounts launched a particular investigation report that referred to as on the colleges to repay over $85 million in state funds.
Within the civil case introduced by Indiana Legal professional Basic Todd Rokita in 2021, a choose just lately ordered the property of Thomas Stoughton and his spouse Rhonda to be positioned in receivership, after discovering that they violated a 2022 order to not switch or promote private property value over $5,000. That lawsuit seeks over $154 million from the defendants.
Clark, Thomas Stoughton, and Rhonda Stoughton — who’re named as defendants within the state’s civil motion — have additionally denied the allegations towards them. (Rhonda Stoughton is just not a defendant within the federal legal case.)
The alleged marketing campaign contributions are a part of a prolonged authorized battle that would depart the state struggling to recoup thousands and thousands of {dollars} meant for college students. Prosecutors within the federal case allege that the colleges accepted over $44 million from the state utilizing inflated pupil counts.
The Home Republican Marketing campaign Committee stated in a press release to Chalkbeat that Home Republicans who obtained the contributions donated these {dollars} to native schooling foundations or different charities.
The committee additionally reiterated its help for college selection.
“For over twenty years, the Home Republican caucus has led the cost to provide all Hoosier households the flexibility to decide on the schooling alternative that most closely fits their children’ wants, whether or not that be conventional Ok-12 faculties, constitution faculties, or college selection vouchers,” the assertion stated.
The Senate Majority Marketing campaign Committee additionally stated in a press release to Chalkbeat that it steered that members who obtained the donations contribute it to an education-related trigger of their district — though it’s unclear whether or not each caucus member did so.
Chalkbeat tried to succeed in all 41 Republican candidates nonetheless dwelling whom prosecutors listed as receiving donations in 2018. Of these, 11 whom Chalkbeat was in a position to attain stated they didn’t know both Thomas Stoughton, Clark, or Training Innovation Analysis; didn’t recall the donation; or recalled returning the donation to native education-related charities or nonprofits. And one senator referred a reporter to the Senate marketing campaign committee’s assertion.
Some have been unaware of Training Innovation Analysis’s ties to the digital constitution faculties. Others who did recall returning the donations informed Chalkbeat that such donations wouldn’t have garnered them favor.
“No person’s ever got here to me and stated, ‘Right here’s cash, that is what we need to do,’” stated former Rep. Jeff Ellington, who stated he doubled the $300 donation he obtained and gave it to a neighborhood academic nonprofit in Greene County.
The trial date within the federal legal case, which incorporates costs of wire fraud and cash laundering, is ready for April 1.
Faculty leaders lobbied to alter funding, prosecutors say
Federal prosecutors allege that Training Innovation Analysis’s 2018 marketing campaign donations have been a part of broader cash laundering efforts that in the end enriched Stoughton and Clark.
Beneath state regulation, constitution college operators are required to be tax-exempt, nonprofit entities and subsequently are prohibited from contributing to political campaigns.
However Training Innovation Analysis’s marketing campaign donations, prosecutors argue, got here from the Indiana Digital Training Basis after passing by means of no less than one shell firm managed by Stoughton.
The corporate was one among a number of that Stoughton created to maneuver cash out of the inspiration “and conceal the place (and to whom) the cash was going,” based on the Nov. 18 court docket submitting.
“If the Defendants didn’t conceal their actions, then IVEF would lose its exempt standing, which might consequence within the lack of its constitution and finish to the inflow of state funds,” federal prosecutors stated within the November submitting. “Merely put, if the Defendants didn’t disguise their actions, then they’d kill the money cow.”
Donations ranged from $300 for numerous lawmakers throughout the state to $5,000 for Brian Bosma, then the speaker of the home, and $5,000 every for the Senate and Home Republican marketing campaign committees. Bosma didn’t reply to a voicemail or e-mail in search of remark.
Chalkbeat checked the donations within the court docket doc towards marketing campaign finance information, and located matching quantities from Training Innovation Analysis besides in 4 circumstances — though three of these exceptions did listing a donation from Alpha Consolidated Companies, LLC, an organization listed as a defendant within the state’s civil case.
Federal prosecutors plan to name a number of witnesses to testify that Stoughton and different defendants “have been lobbying to alter the enrollment and attendance necessities in Indiana’s college funding regulation to make the regulation extra favorable to them,” they stated within the submitting.
Six present and former lawmakers — former Reps. Sharon Negele, Woody Burton, and Tim Brown, former Sen. Jon Ford, Sen. Jean Leising, and Rep. Christopher Judy — informed Chalkbeat they didn’t recall the donation or whether or not they returned it to native causes. Rep. Heath VanNatter stated he recalled speaking concerning the donation when it occurred, however didn’t recall whether or not he returned the donation.
These lawmakers additionally stated they have been unaware of the donation’s ties to the digital faculties.
“I simply know if I used to be instructed to try this, I might’ve finished it,” Negele stated of the directive from the Republican marketing campaign committee to return the donation to charity.
4 former lawmakers — Ellington, former Rep. Tony Cook dinner, and former Sens. John Ruckelshaus and Philip Boots — informed Chalkbeat they recalled giving the cash again to native academic causes.
After Chalkbeat’s investigation into the 2 digital faculties generated elevated scrutiny, lawmakers modified state regulation in 2019 to extend oversight.
Indiana regulation now forbids college districts from authorizing digital charters, and requires college students who’re habitually truant to be withdrawn from digital faculties. The legislature additionally authorized a funding reduce for digital faculties, which now obtain 85% of the state funding that college students at brick-and-mortar public faculties obtain.
Some Democrats stated the adjustments didn’t go far sufficient.
Indiana might not recoup funding meant for college students
It’s unclear whether or not Indiana will ever recoup the cash the Stoughtons, Clark, and others allegedly squandered.
After failing to pay the legal professional he initially employed within the federal legal case, Stoughton has obtained a court-appointed legal professional as a substitute, court docket paperwork present.
Within the state civil motion, the court docket positioned the Stoughtons’ property into receivership final month after it decided they violated a 2022 order limiting them from transferring or promoting property.
The court docket discovered that the Stoughtons violated the order on account of their transactions associated to a luxurious beachside Florida condominium they initially purchased for roughly $1.5 million in 2016.
The state alleged {that a} Florida court docket ordered a foreclosures on the condominium in 2024, after the couple didn’t make funds on a $1.8 million mortgage issued the yr prior.
The Stoughtons’ property embody a Cadillac, a Corvette, a ship, seven items of Tiffany jewellery, and a lakeside residence in Syracuse, based on a Feb. 5 court docket submitting within the state case.
Hamilton County property tax information additionally present the couple owes over $19,000 in unpaid taxes on their Carmel residence.
Amelia Pak-Harvey covers Indianapolis and Lawrence Township faculties for Chalkbeat Indiana. Contact Amelia at apak-harvey@chalkbeat.org.