The choice of US President Donald Trump’s administration to droop overseas support and shut down the USAID company has despatched shockwaves throughout the event trade. In 2024, almost a 3rd of the $41bn in US overseas support went to Africa, serving to help varied sectors from healthcare to schooling and sanitation.
However as support organisations sound alarm bells and authorities officers wring their palms over suspended programmes, we’re lacking the larger image: Africa’s continued dependence on overseas support is a selection, not a necessity. Our continent sits atop among the world’s largest reserves of the very minerals that may energy the longer term, but we stay trapped in cycles of support dependency. It’s time to change that.
Allow us to be clear about what’s at stake. The Democratic Republic of the Congo provides 70 p.c of the world’s cobalt – the important ingredient in electrical automobile batteries. South Africa produces 75 p.c of the world’s platinum and 50 p.c of palladium. Mozambique and Madagascar possess among the largest graphite deposits globally. Zimbabwe has the most important deposits of caesium, a essential steel utilized in GPS and 5G programs.
Extra than simply rocks and metals, these are the keys to the worldwide clear power transition. Each electrical automobile, photo voltaic panel, and wind turbine will depend on minerals that Africa has in abundance.
But right here we’re, nonetheless exporting uncooked supplies like colonial-era vassals whereas begging for support from the identical nations that revenue from our sources. The maths is infuriating: We promote uncooked cobalt for $26-30 per kg (2.2lb), whereas battery-grade processed supplies fetch $150-200. We’re gifting away greater than 80 p.c of the worth chain to overseas processors and producers. This isn’t simply dangerous enterprise – it’s financial malpractice.
The worldwide battery market alone will attain $250bn by 2030. The renewable power sector is rising at breakneck pace, with photo voltaic installations growing 26 p.c yearly.
Clearly, Africa’s mineral riches characterize the best financial alternative of our era. However as an alternative of positioning ourselves to seize this worth, we’re debating how you can patch the holes left by suspended support programmes.
Critics will say we lack the infrastructure, experience, and capital to course of these minerals ourselves. They’re proper – for now. However that is exactly the place we ought to be investing our sources and focusing our political will. The Chinese language understood this a long time in the past, which is why they’ve poured almost $58bn into securing management of essential mineral provide chains throughout Africa. They noticed the longer term whereas we had been busy filling out support utility types.
The answer isn’t difficult, although it’s difficult. We have to construct processing services, not simply extraction websites. We have to set up particular financial zones targeted on mineral beneficiation, not merely export terminals. We have to spend money on analysis and growth services that may adapt and enhance processing applied sciences. Most significantly, we have to suppose and act regionally.
Think about a Southern African Growth Group Battery Supplies Initiative, the place nations pool sources and experience to construct built-in worth chains. Image an East African Uncommon Earth Parts Cooperation Framework that turns our mineral wealth into high-tech manufacturing capabilities. These will not be pipe goals – they’re missed alternatives day-after-day we proceed enterprise as regular.
The environmental critics will say mining is soiled and harmful. They’re not unsuitable concerning the dangers, however they’re unsuitable concerning the answer. The reply isn’t to depart our minerals within the floor; it’s to set our personal excessive requirements for sustainable extraction and processing. We are able to construct a mining and processing trade that protects our surroundings and advantages our communities. We should, as a result of the choice is watching overseas corporations do it their means whereas we take care of the implications.
The help suspension has created human struggling that can not be ignored. HIV therapy programmes, instructional initiatives, and meals safety tasks are all in danger. But when these programmes are important – and plenty of of them are – why ought to we rely on the political whims of overseas governments to fund them? Our minerals would pay for these programmes many instances over as soon as we seize their full worth.
What we want now could be political braveness and unity of objective. We’d like leaders who can look past the following election cycle and envision an Africa that funds its personal growth. We’d like enterprise leaders who can construct processing services as an alternative of export terminals. We’d like instructional establishments that practice chemical engineers and metallurgists as an alternative of support programme directors.
The present disaster should function our catalyst for transformation. Each suspended support greenback ought to drive us to seize tenfold worth from our minerals, and each diplomatic slight ought to strengthen our resolve to construct African options. The selection is obvious: We are able to spend the approaching a long time haggling over support budgets, or we are able to lastly take management of our future by way of the strategic growth of our mineral wealth.
It’s time for Africa to rework from the world’s uncooked supplies retailer into its manufacturing powerhouse. By turning our mineral wealth into lasting prosperity, we are able to make overseas support what it ought to have been all alongside: pointless.
The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.