OPINION — For the reason that starting of the warfare in Ukraine, I’ve discovered the acquainted rhetoric supporting Ukraine’s proper to self-defense towards Russian aggression harking back to the discourse that adopted America’s engagement in Afghanistan. From the outset, I nervous that Ukraine would possibly expertise the identical trajectory: beneficiant assist early on, adopted by political fatigue and eventual “abandonment.” The sample of improvement of dependency—the place the supported authorities is unable to maintain itself with out steady help—might be deeply damaging and depart a nation weak.
Regrettably, as a substitute of using America’s affect to result in an early diplomatic decision to the Ukraine battle, President Joe Biden escalated navy assist, contributing to a chronic and more and more advanced warfare. Ukraine has since turn into closely reliant on U.S. monetary help, weapons, and intelligence. But this assist has typically appeared unstable, often threatened by inside U.S. politics. Notably, President Donald Trump has repeatedly signaled a willingness to halt assist, a place that intensified following political tensions between his administration and President Volodymyr Zelensky. This rising reliance locations Kyiv in a weak place—strikingly much like the state of affairs Kabul confronted in the course of the U.S.-Taliban negotiations beneath President Trump’s first time period. The U.S. held huge leverage in each conflicts and thus bore a major accountability for his or her outcomes. As somebody who was concerned within the Afghanistan peace course of and follows Ukraine peace efforts intently, I see a troubling resemblance between Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad’s dealings with the Taliban, and the way in which American politics are actually shaping Ukraine’s destiny.
President Trump has expressed sturdy curiosity in resolving the warfare in Ukraine and has solid himself as a “President of Peace.” Because the chief of essentially the most highly effective nation on this planet, he does possess the flexibility to affect the warfare’s trajectory. Nonetheless, the crucial query stays: what sort of peace is being pursued? Will it mirror the result in Afghanistan, the place the U.S. successfully handed over energy to the very group accountable for the 9/11 assaults, sidelining its allies and undermining their legitimacy? The U.S. should proceed with authority—not one other “Doha-style” deal which might ship harmful alerts globally, about America’s reliability as a peace maker, negotiator and at last associate.
Specialists are gathering at The Cipher Temporary’s NatSecEDGE convention June 5-6 in Austin, TX to speak about the way forward for warfare. Be part of the dialog.
Parallels in Negotiation Dynamics:
There are a number of notable parallels between the U.S. strategy to the Afghanistan peace course of and its present involvement within the Ukraine battle. Whereas the contexts differ, the patterns in negotiation techniques, therapy of allies, and use of leverage reveal putting similarities. These shared dynamics provide essential classes—classes that, if ignored, may result in repeated strategic failures. Three key parallels stand out:
1. Russia’s Insistence with the U.S.-Led Talks:
President Putin’s refusal to interact immediately with President Zelensky in Istanbul, insisting as a substitute on first reaching an understanding with the U.S., mirrors the Taliban’s place in the course of the Doha talks. The Taliban demanded negotiations completely with the USA earlier than any engagement with the Afghan authorities. This tactic successfully marginalized the nationwide authorities, granting the Taliban higher legitimacy. In Ukraine’s case, ought to Russia safe a cope with Washington that renders the U.S. impartial or much less engaged, it will possible tilt the battlefield dynamics in Moscow’s favor. We witnessed the same shift in Afghanistan, the place repeated Afghan objections to their exclusion have been dismissed as obstructionist to the peace talks. I recall a number of conferences on the presidential palace in Kabul, the place Ambassador Khalilzad emphasised that “the U.S. doesn’t want anybody’s permission to barter with the Taliban or to withdraw its troops.” This narrative turned a rhetorical weapon to close down legitimate issues about an orderly and inclusive peace course of.
2. Public Discrediting of Allies:
One other shared sample is the notion of “undermining allies.” In Afghanistan, Ambassador Khalilzad publicly criticized the Afghan authorities—particularly President Ashraf Ghani—for being an impediment to peace, reasonably than acknowledging reliable issues. Ghani’s polarizing management model made him a simple goal, permitting Khalilzad’s narrative to achieve traction amongst Afghan elites and the general public. In Ukraine, the tone of public discourse from U.S. officers, together with the President, has at occasions appeared dismissive or crucial of the Ukrainian authorities. This public framing might be damaging. It echoes the stress confronted by the Afghan authorities to make main concessions—corresponding to the discharge of 5,000 Taliban prisoners—regardless of warnings from Afghan management. In each circumstances, U.S. rhetoric has eroded the morale of associate forces and given adversaries the higher hand in psychological warfare. In Afghanistan, this contributed on to the collapse of state constructions and navy cohesion. Language issues. Classes from Afghanistan ought to inform a extra cautious, respectful U.S. posture in Ukraine.
3. Conditioning Help and Misusing Leverage:
Threats to droop assist for Ukraine, don’t advance peace. They embolden adversaries and sow uncertainty. American leverage ought to be used to finish violence, not danger enabling it. Any withdrawal of help ought to be tied to the profitable cessation of hostilities and institution of a viable simply peace. In any other case, efforts at diplomacy danger failing, and President Trump’s envisioned “peace legacy” could as a substitute be remembered as a geopolitical failure.
Join The Cipher Temporary’s Nightcap publication: one of the best ways to unwind every single day whereas nonetheless staying in control on nationwide safety.Join at this time.
Suggestions:
Primarily based on the teachings realized from Afghanistan, the next suggestion is essential for avoiding comparable pitfalls in Ukraine:
Firstly, the U.S. should keep away from the crucial mistake made in the course of the Afghanistan peace course of—negotiating immediately with adversaries whereas sidelining reliable nationwide governments. Within the case of Afghanistan, excluding the Afghan authorities and the Afghan individuals from early levels of the U.S.-Taliban talks severely weakened its authority, emboldened the Taliban, and finally led to the collapse of the Afghan state. This strategy not solely demoralized U.S. allies but in addition delegitimized them within the eyes of their very own individuals and the worldwide group. In Ukraine, the USA should undertake a special course. Any peace initiative should place the Ukrainian authorities and the individuals of Ukraine on the middle of negotiations—not as a passive recipient of selections made elsewhere, however as an energetic, equal stakeholder. Peace achieved with out the consent and management of each side of the battle—the Ukrainian individuals and its adversaries—shall be fragile, not sustainable, and short-lived.
Secondly, public messaging should replicate respect and unity. Criticizing allies in public, whereas signaling tolerance or engagement with aggressors behind closed doorways, undermines belief, morale, and credibility. Strategic ambiguity might be exploited by adversaries to sow discord, because it was by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Ukraine deserves a peace course of that’s inclusive, dignified, and respectful of its sovereignty. The world can not afford a repeat of the Kabul situation—the place allies have been sidelined, and adversaries gaining upper-hand. The U.S. management, as at all times, have to be principled, constant, and anchored in classes realized from previous missteps. If managed correctly, the peace course of in Ukraine may certainly mark a transformative legacy for American diplomacy, not solely because the associate to depend on however as a negotiator with making the precise deal.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.