For detractors of Tunisia’s President Kais Saied, the trial of greater than 40 opposition figures is kind of clearly an extra nail within the coffin of the nation’s democracy – and the rule of legislation.
The defendants within the trial – which resumes on Friday after being adjourned the day it opened on March 4 – are a number of the authorities’s main critics. They embody former diplomats, media personalities, and members of what was as soon as parliament’s largest celebration, the ‘Muslim Democrat’ Ennahda.
And but, they face prices comparable to “plotting towards the state” and “belonging to a terrorist group”, accusations that have been denounced on the primary day of the trial as an “absurdity” by defence lawyer Abdelaziz Essid.
A kind of being tried – in absentia – in what has turn out to be generally known as the ‘conspiracy case’ is even the French mental, Bernard-Henri Levy, who’s accused of being a conduit between defendants and overseas events.
Info on the exact particulars of the trial stay cloudy, with the precise variety of these on trial and the precise prices they face unclear.
The mass trial has been denounced each on the streets of Tunis, the place lots of of individuals took to the streets on Wednesday, and by observers and analysts who spoke to Al Jazeera and describe the court docket proceedings as one other instance of Saied’s deliberate silencing of dissent.
Flawed trial
Rights teams, together with Human Rights Watch (HRW), have slammed the mass trial as proof of a “weaponised” judiciary and an extra crackdown on elementary freedoms. Within the build-up to the trial, the United Nations criticised the federal government, calling on it in a press release earlier this yr to “finish all types of persecution of opponents and activists”.
The Tunisian International Ministry subsequently criticised what it stated have been “inaccuracies” within the UN assertion.
In February, 9 of the defendants going through trial have been deemed “too harmful” to attend their trial in particular person.
Six of them, together with main opposition determine Jaouhar Ben Mbarek and a former Ennahdha chief, Abdelhamid Jelassi, have been held since February 2023.
Ben Mbarek started a starvation strike on March 30 to protest his exclusion from his trial.
He was joined on Wednesday by 5 different defendants equally excluded from their trial – the aforementioned Jelassi, politicians Issam Chebbi, Khayam Turki and Ghazi Chaouachi, and lawyer Ridha Belhaj.
The entire defendants face prolonged jail sentences if discovered responsible, as much as and together with the demise penalty, which has been suspended in Tunisia since 1991.
“President Saied has weaponised Tunisia’s judicial system to go after political opponents and dissidents, throwing folks in arbitrary detention on flimsy proof and pursuing them with abusive prosecutions,” Bassam Khawaja, deputy Center East and North Africa director at HRW, informed Al Jazeera.
Weakening the judiciary
Elevated authorities management over the judiciary have many observers fearful as as to whether the defendants within the trial have a practical likelihood of being discovered harmless, even when the proof towards them is weak.
Doubts over the independence of Tunisia’s judiciary have grown since Saied dissolved the nation’s judicial council in 2022 after which changed it with a physique he has extra management over.
What inner resistance remained to Saied’s modifications resulted in June that yr, when he dismissed 57 judges, telling a tv viewers he had “given alternative after alternative and warning after warning to the judiciary to purify itself”.
“The conspiracy trial is a dwelling instance of how the workplace of the prosecutor and courts are used as a device to crush dissent and to crack down on the rule of legislation and elementary freedoms,” Mentioned Benarbia of the Worldwide Fee of Jurists informed Al Jazeera.
“The extended, arbitrary pre-trial detention, the shortage of credible proof, and the order prohibiting a number of the defendants from attending their very own trial in particular person, go away little doubt as to the unfairness and the politicised nature of the conspiracy trial,” he stated.
Now not a hit story
Tunisia had been celebrated as one of many few successes of the 2011 “Arab Spring” revolutions, with robust political engagement amongst its public and civil society members, who continuously took to the airwaves and streets to make their voices heard.
The years that adopted the revolution, which overthrew long-time autocrat Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, noticed the expansion of a wholesome political system with quite a few elections declared free and honest by worldwide observers.
However a weak economic system and the strengthening of anti-democratic forces led to a pushback, capped off by Saied’s dismissal of the federal government and dissolution of parliament in 2021 and 2022.
He has since dominated by presidential decree and rewritten the nation’s structure, entrenching the ability of the presidency.
Alongside that centralisation of energy has been a purge of Saied’s opponents, together with politicians and distinguished figures inside Tunisia’s previously booming activist teams.
Amongst these focused embody Ennahda figures comparable to chief and the previous speaker of parliament Rached Ghannouchi, former Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi, former Minister of Justice Noureddine Bhiri, and Mentioned Ferjani, a member of the celebration’s political govt. However the crackdown has additionally hit many non-Ennahda figures, together with Abir Moussi, a former help of Ben Ali and a fierce critic of Ennahda, and Abderrazek Krimi, the challenge director of the Tunisian Refugee Council.
Ferjani, Bhiri and Moussi are all among the many defendants within the present mass trial.
The suppression of Tunisia’s opposition has additionally accompanied different efforts denounced by rights teams.
In September 2022, Saied handed a decree criminalising any “faux information” unfold by digital means, with the accountability of deciding what was “faux” falling to the more and more obedient court docket system.
Below this legislation, greater than 60 folks, together with journalists, attorneys, and opposition figures, have been prosecuted for public speech deemed legally false, Zied Dabber, the pinnacle of the Nationwide Union of Tunisian Journalists, was quoted as saying by the AFP information company final yr, the overwhelming majority of them for criticising Saied and his administration.
“Persons are scared and persons are drained,” the Tunisian writer Hatem Nafti, who now lives in Paris, informed Al Jazeera.
“Individuals know they will go to jail for nothing,” he continued.
“Worry isn’t new to Tunisia. I lived the primary a part of my life underneath Ben Ali,” he stated of the Tunisia’s president from 1987 till 2011. However Nafti stated that underneath Ben Ali Tunisians knew that the purple traces largely surrounded the president and the governing system, whereas now it was much less clear what would make an individual fall foul of the authorities.
“For those who criticised him [Ben Ali], you went to jail. Now, there are not any guidelines,” Nafti stated.
He pointed to pals of his, such because the outspoken left-wing firebrand Hamma Hammami, who often criticises Saied but stays at liberty, and others, such because the lawyer Sonia Dahmani, who faces trial right this moment for seemingly innocuous feedback made throughout a chat present.
“There are not any guidelines, nothing,” Nafti stated of the current administration, “and I believe that makes folks extra afraid.”