Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, has been advocating for a 120-hour workweek for his Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE) staff. Nonetheless, a Stanford researcher has challenged this method, citing its potential “detrimental well being outcomes.”
What Occurred: Musk has been selling a grueling work schedule for his DOGE staff, which is tasked with implementing cost-cutting measures throughout the federal authorities. This method, nevertheless, has been criticized by Alison T. Wynn, a senior analysis scholar at the Stanford VMware Girls’s Management Innovation Lab in an opinion submit for MSNBC.
“There’s only one drawback: Musk and his staff are mistaken,” she mentioned.
Wynn argued that the assumption that lengthy hours equate to elevated productiveness is “not solely outdated however unfounded.”
See Additionally: Wall Road Drops On Tariffs Menace, Greenback Rises, Uber Rockets On Ackman’s Tweet: What’s Driving Markets Friday?
“As an alternative, analysis clearly exhibits that working lengthy hours would not make you a greater worker. In reality, it will probably lead workers to battle and even make catastrophic errors. That is regarding it doesn’t matter what job you are doing, however it could be of particular concern for the Musk staff dealing with delicate information methods that contact the lives and livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of People.”
Wynn additionally highlighted the hostile results of this work tradition on workers’ bodily and emotional well-being. She referenced research that confirmed elevated stress and work-life battle on account of rising time calls for, which can result in excessive turnover, dissatisfaction, and detrimental well being outcomes.
Opposite to the assumption that lengthy hours are obligatory for productiveness, Wynn cited a 2024 examine revealed in Nature, which discovered that workers working from residence two days per week had been simply as productive as these working full-time within the workplace.
Why It Issues: Musk’s DOGE initiative has been a topic of intense scrutiny and debate. The challenge, which goals to chop $2 trillion from the federal finances by 2026, has been met with skepticism by some economists.
Former White Home Council of Financial Advisers Chair Jason Furman identified potential discrepancies in Musk’s claims relating to federal spending reductions and the proposed fiscal targets.
Regardless of the criticism, Musk’s initiative has additionally obtained help. Alex Karp, the CEO of Palantir Applied sciences Inc., has expressed enthusiasm for the DOGE initiative, anticipating a constructive final result for his firm.
Nonetheless, not everyone seems to be on board with Musk’s method. Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn and former COO of PayPal, has criticized Musk’s fast chopping of presidency applications on behalf of his Division of Authorities Effectivity, stating that there’s a purpose the authorities doesn’t work like corporations.
Learn Subsequent:
Disclaimer: This content material was partially produced with the assistance of AI instruments and was reviewed and revealed by Benzinga editors.
Photograph courtesy: Shutterstock
Market Information and Information delivered to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga doesn’t present funding recommendation. All rights reserved.