10 Greatest ERP Programs Put To the Take a look at: My Verdict

I’ve labored with numerous groups—gross sales, advertising, finance, and mission administration—and I’ve seen firsthand how enterprise useful resource planning (ERP) programs could be each extremely useful and a supply of limitless complications.

I like how greatest ERP programs promise streamlined operations, higher insights, and a unified view of the enterprise. However generally it doesn’t take lengthy earlier than you’re asking, why is that this so sophisticated? Or why can’t it simply do what we’d like it to do?

I’ve been by way of all of it: making an attempt to adapt an ERP system to suit enterprise processes it wasn’t designed for, seeing groups be taught programs that really feel something however user-friendly, and even the invention of hidden prices after the implementation is already underway. 

I do know these challenges shortly compound whenever you attempt to ‘get it proper’ throughout ERP software program choice course of. You will in all probability agree with me {that a} incorrect alternative disrupts workflows, demoralizes staff, and wastes valuable sources.

Whether or not you’re upgrading from an outdated answer or exploring ERP programs for the primary time, I wish to enable you to determine purple flags and select a system that aligns along with your wants. That’s why I teamed up with Gabriel Gheorghiu, our resident ERP professional, and labored with of us from every kind of groups that depend on ERPs that can assist you discover one of the best ERP programs on the market.

After exploring ERP programs, I discovered that one of the best ones combine key enterprise processes like finance, HR, and provide chain into one platform. They provide real-time knowledge for smarter decision-making, are scalable to develop with your enterprise, and have user-friendly interfaces with robust buyer help, making them important for streamlining operations and bettering effectivity.

My tackle what units greatest ERP programs aside

After I began consider ERP programs, I concentrate on a couple of crucial components to make sure the system is an ideal match for the enterprise. Right here’s what I search for:

• Suits enterprise wants: I began by guaranteeing the ERP system matches particular enterprise processes and necessities that almost all customers need. It has to deal with all of the necessities, like finance, HR, provide chain, and mission administration, whereas additionally addressing any industry-specific wants. For me, if it doesn’t help the best way the enterprise works at present and the place it’s headed, it’s not the fitting alternative.
• Scalability: I additionally evaluated whether or not the ERP software program can develop with the enterprise. A fantastic ERP system ought to deal with elevated workloads, help extra customers, and adapt to enterprise or course of modifications with out inflicting main disruptions. 
• Integrations: An ERP system additionally has to work seamlessly with current instruments, whether or not it’s CRM software program, e-commerce platforms, or different specialised purposes. If it doesn’t combine nicely, it creates extra issues than it solves. I examined how simply the ERP communicates with different programs to make sure clean knowledge circulation throughout the group.
• Ease of use: If the ERP system isn’t intuitive, it could actually result in frustration and low adoption charges amongst your group members. That is why I paid shut consideration to the coaching and sources the seller supplies. For me, a very good ERP goes past providing nice options. It makes it straightforward for folks to truly use these options.
• Complete value of possession (TCO): I additionally regarded into the prices, not simply the upfront price ticket. This consists of implementation, licensing, customization, coaching, ongoing upkeep, and upgrades. Understanding the long-term monetary dedication helps keep away from disagreeable surprises down the road. I all the time suggest evaluating the TCO in opposition to the worth the ERP answer brings to the desk.
• Vendor status: Lastly, I thought-about the seller’s monitor file. I learn opinions, checked out their buyer base, and even talked to present customers after I may. Figuring out I can rely on the seller for assist with implementation, troubleshooting, and updates offers me peace of thoughts.

By specializing in these components, you may confidently select an ERP system that meets present wants and units you up for long-term success. Over the previous few weeks, I examined over 20 ERP software program options. The highest 10 that made the checklist stood out for his or her skill to satisfy enterprise wants, ease of integration, user-friendly design, and total cost-effectiveness.

To be included within the ERP software program class, a product should:

• Normal ledger, accounts payable/receivable, budgeting, and money administration options
• Human sources performance like recruiting and payroll, or integration with HR and payroll options
• Fundamental gross sales and buyer administration options or integration with CRM options
• Features to create quotes, gross sales orders, and returns
• Buying workflows and buy order administration
• Work with stock and warehouse administration software program for choosing, packing, and transport
• Supply superior provide chain modules, together with demand planning and transportation administration for distribution corporations
• Present manufacturing modules like invoice of supplies (BOM), manufacturing useful resource planning (MRP), and high quality administration options for manufacturing corporations
• Characteristic reporting and analytics for all of the modules included within the ERP answer

After I labored with NetSuite, I discovered it to be technically sturdy, cloud-based ERP answer that brings all core enterprise capabilities like finance, CRM, stock, and e-commerce onto a single, unified platform.

What I discovered spectacular was its real-time visibility into monetary and operational knowledge, which makes decision-making extra knowledgeable and strategic. Its flexibility is wonderful too, with a excessive degree of customization for workflows, studies, and dashboards, so I can tailor it to suit particular enterprise wants completely. Plus, its scalable structure handles rising transaction volumes and person bases with out skipping a beat, making it ideally suited for companies getting ready to increase.

NetSuite additionally excels with its integration capabilities. Its software programming interfaces (APIs) make connecting with third-party purposes simple, guaranteeing clean knowledge circulation throughout programs. I additionally appreciated its automation instruments, which cut back guide work and enhance effectivity throughout departments. 

I’ve additionally discovered some challenges. Implementing NetSuite generally is a advanced course of, requiring time, experience, and thorough coaching for groups to completely undertake it. The pricing is one thing I all the time stored in thoughts, because the subscription charges, add-on modules, and ongoing upkeep can add up shortly, particularly for smaller companies. I seen occasional efficiency points, like system sluggishness or downtime, which could be irritating throughout busy durations.

Buyer help is one other space the place I’ve seen room for enchancment. Whereas it’s accessible, resolving extra technical points typically takes longer than I’d like, so I made positive to have both inner experience or dependable exterior consultants readily available. 

What I dislike about NetSuite:

• I discovered the implementation course of to be difficult and costly, particularly with the extra prices for superior modules and upkeep.
• I’ve skilled occasional system slowdowns, and the shopper help can generally be much less responsive than I’d like.

What G2 customers dislike about NetSuite:

“The implementation course of was insufficient. There wasn’t ample evaluation of the prevailing workflows by the NetSuite subject material specialists to find out (a) how NetSuite may accommodate current workflows or (b) if current workflows wanted to vary to accommodate NetSuite processes or maybe leverage NetSuite options and capabilities. Equally, the coaching was missing. It was extra an illustration of default NetSuite options somewhat than coaching on the product as put in and configured in our surroundings. Whereas extra coaching and help is obtainable for a payment, the essential implementation and coaching have to be strengthened to help a profitable preliminary adoption.”

– NetSuite Evaluate, Richard Okay.

When utilizing Microsoft Dynamics 365 Enterprise Central, I discovered it to be a sturdy, cloud-based ERP answer that integrates important enterprise capabilities like finance, gross sales, stock, and customer support.

What stood out to me is how seamlessly it linked with different Microsoft merchandise, like Workplace 365 and Outlook. I used to be additionally impressed by its monetary administration instruments which offered our group real-time insights into accounting, budgeting, and monetary efficiency.

I additionally appreciated the pliability of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Enterprise Central. I may customise workflows and studies to suit particular enterprise wants. Plus, the power to combine with third-party purposes lets us increase its performance as wanted. 

I felt the educational curve was steep, particularly for these new to ERP programs, so coaching is crucial to get essentially the most out of it. Our group additionally realized that customization could be advanced and create points throughout system upgrades, which could require extra developer help. I additionally did not like how licensing charges and the price of superior options or customizations can shortly add up.

What I dislike about Microsoft Dynamics 365 Enterprise Central:

• I felt that getting began could be difficult, particularly for these new to ERP programs. It takes time and coaching to completely perceive and use all its options.
• Whereas I admire the customization choices, they will generally make issues overly advanced and result in points throughout system upgrades.

What G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Dynamics 365 Enterprise Central:

“It presents challenges emigrate enterprise knowledge and workflows to completely different platforms or answer suppliers.”

– Microsoft Dynamics 365 Enterprise Central Evaluate, Ramy S.

I like how SAP S/4HANA Cloud simplifies each day operations, reduces upkeep time, and enhances total productiveness. This cloud-based ERP system supplies real-time knowledge entry, which helped our group entry correct insights and make knowledgeable choices. 

I additionally admire its sturdy knowledge modeling options, which help superior reporting and predictive analytics. The system’s skill to course of giant volumes of knowledge in-memory permits for fast and correct reporting, making it simpler to forecast traits and make strategic plans. Moreover, our group appreciated how SAP S/4HANA Cloud provides robust connectivity with different SAP options and third-party instruments, enabling clean knowledge alternate and course of automation.

Throughout testing, we realized that its complexity can result in a steep studying curve, requiring thorough coaching for groups to completely use its capabilities. Whereas customization is feasible, the cloud model has sure limitations, making it more durable to adapt the system to distinctive enterprise wants.

Talking of implementation, I felt that it’s a resource-intensive course of that calls for detailed planning and expert personnel, which might prolong timelines and improve bills.

What I dislike about SAP S/4HANA Cloud:

• I felt that the platform is very advanced, and it takes numerous coaching and time for groups to completely perceive and use its options successfully.
• The excessive licensing charges and resource-intensive implementation course of make it a big funding, particularly for smaller organizations.

What G2 customers dislike about SAP S/4HANA Cloud:

Utilizing Sage Intacct provided our group a transformative expertise for managing advanced monetary operations.

It’s a cloud-based ERP answer constructed with monetary administration at its core, and what stands out for me is its intuitive, user-friendly interface that reduces the educational curve and boosts productiveness. The system provides highly effective options like automated accounts payable and receivable, sturdy common ledger performance, superior buying workflows, and extremely detailed monetary reporting.

I notably worth its skill to ship real-time insights, because of its superior analytics instruments, which preserve me knowledgeable about each facet of our enterprise’s monetary well being.

I additionally like how Sage Intacct connects effortlessly with third-party instruments like Salesforce, payroll programs, and expense administration software program, making a unified ecosystem. I additionally admire the multi-entity administration characteristic which simplifies consolidations, foreign money conversions, and inter-entity transactions, making it ideally suited for companies with subsidiaries or international operations. Its scalability ensures it could actually deal with rising transaction volumes and customers as our enterprise grows, with out sacrificing efficiency.

Whereas the reporting instruments are complete, I discovered that customizing them could be extra advanced than anticipated, typically requiring superior data or help from a guide. Some integrations, particularly with extra specialised instruments or configurations, could be difficult to arrange and keep. 

What I dislike about Sage Intacct:

• Whereas the reporting instruments are highly effective, I discover customizing them overly advanced, typically requiring further coaching or guide help.
• The beginning value of $400 per person per thirty days, together with extra prices for modules and customers, can add up shortly, which is a problem for smaller companies.

What G2 customers dislike about Sage Intacct:

“The service course of is rarely as straightforward as I would like it to be. It’s important to log into the neighborhood. Moreover, some modules are higher than others. The pay as you go expense module has glitches that you just be taught to work round, however restrict full performance. I additionally want the app was extra dynamic, as I’m steadily on the transfer.”

– Sage Intacct Evaluate, Kendall W.

Once we first began utilizing Acumatica, what struck us was how seamlessly it introduced every little thing collectively.

It’s a cloud-based powerhouse that may deal with our core enterprise processes, from funds and stock to CRM and past. The interface is clear and user-friendly, which suggests we are able to concentrate on getting work completed as an alternative of determining easy methods to use the system. It’s designed for effectivity, and that reveals in how easily it integrates operations throughout our enterprise.

What I like most about Acumatica is its flexibility. I can customise workflows, studies, and dashboards to tailor every little thing to how our groups work. And Acumatica scales effortlessly, dealing with elevated transactions and customers with out lacking a beat. Plus, because it’s cloud-based, we are able to entry every little thing from wherever, whether or not we’re within the workplace or on the go.

Implementing Acumatica took us some effort because it’s not a plug-and-play answer. The setup course of required planning and experience, particularly when integrating it with our current programs. And whereas the pricing mannequin is truthful, the price of add-ons and customizations can creep up, so it’s one thing we needed to price range for. Superior options, like automation and customized reporting, additionally took a little bit of time to grasp.

What I dislike about Acumatica:

• I noticed that organising Acumatica required cautious planning and technical experience, which made the onboarding course of longer than I anticipated.
• Whereas the essential instruments are simple, mastering the extra superior options like automation and customized reporting took our group time and further coaching.

What G2 customers dislike about Acumatica:

“As a person of the payroll module, I feel having a human sources info system (HRIS) would significantly improve the payroll processing. There may be fairly a disconnect between HR performance within the system that must be completed exterior of the system.”

– Acumatica Evaluate, Jennifer G.

Once we examined SAP ECC or SAP ERP Central Element, we cherished the way it’s constructed to deal with complexity with precision and effectivity.

For us, it acted as a command heart that linked each a part of our enterprise, from finance and gross sales to stock and provide chain. The sheer vary of its modules, like Monetary Accounting, Supplies Administration, and Gross sales & Distribution, gave us the instruments we have to streamline operations throughout departments, all whereas maintaining every little thing in sync.

We additionally cherished SAP ECC’s flexibility. We may decide and select the modules we’d like, customizing the system to suit our distinctive enterprise processes. As our firm grows, SAP ECC grows with us, scaling effortlessly to deal with extra customers, transactions, and even international operations.

Plus, I cherished how we may join SAP ECC with different SAP instruments, like Enterprise Warehouse, and even non-SAP programs. This created a seamless circulation of knowledge, saving us from the complications of disconnected platforms and guide workarounds. For specialised wants, the industry-specific options really feel like they have been made only for our enterprise.

The standard person interface can really feel a bit clunky and outdated, particularly when in comparison with newer ERP programs with smooth, fashionable designs. It’s purposeful, however getting our group up to the mark took a while and coaching. Implementing SAP ECC required meticulous planning, expert experience, and a big monetary funding. Upkeep and upgrades additionally require ongoing consideration and sources.

I generally want the system provided real-time analytics as an alternative of counting on batch processing, which might delay insights once we want them most. And whereas we admire its customization capabilities, setting every little thing up can get sophisticated, typically needing exterior consultants to get it proper.

What I dislike about SAP ECC:

• The interface feels previous and clunky, which makes it more durable for brand spanking new customers to be taught and slows down adoption inside our group.
• Implementing and sustaining SAP ECC requires numerous time, experience, and monetary funding, which might really feel overwhelming, particularly throughout preliminary setup.

What G2 customers dislike about SAP ECC:

“One of many main issues I disliked about SAP ECC is the educational curve and value related to the software program. Resulting from its complexity, there may be typically a steep studying curve related to SAP ECC. New customers may require in depth coaching to successfully use the system. Additionally, implementing and sustaining SAP ECC could be costly, not solely when it comes to software program licenses but in addition when it comes to {hardware}, coaching, and ongoing help.”

– SAP ECC Evaluate, Bhavesh G.

Deltek Costpoint stood out to me for its concentrate on compliance and regulatory help for presidency contractors  It’s designed to deal with the complexities of assembly the Protection Contract Audit Company (DCAA), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and Value Accounting Requirements (CAS) necessities, taking numerous the stress out of guaranteeing authorities contractor companies keep audit-ready.

I like the built-in instruments for monitoring oblique charges, managing time and expense reporting, and sustaining correct mission accounting. I’ve discovered that this degree of compliance integration is one thing different ERP programs typically wrestle to match.

One other characteristic I actually admire is its workforce administration capabilities. Deltek Costpoint additionally manages big selection of functionalities from automating payroll processes to monitoring worker hours and mission allocations. We love how the expertise administration instruments assist companies with hiring and onboarding, which saves corporations time and ensures they will discover and retain one of the best expertise for tasks. 

Implementing Deltek Costpoint was an in depth and resource-intensive course of. It took us cautious planning, technical experience, and a big time funding to configure it correctly and combine it with our current programs. Whereas the interface is intuitive when you’re accustomed to it, mastering its full capabilities meant investing in thorough coaching for our group.

I seen efficiency can generally be a difficulty, notably when processing giant knowledge units or operating advanced queries. These moments of slowdown can disrupt workflows. 

What I dislike about Deltek Costpoint:

• Getting Deltek Costpoint up and operating was a protracted and resource-intensive course of for us. It required important planning and technical experience to configure every little thing correctly.
• Whereas the system is highly effective, mastering its huge performance took numerous coaching. Plus, I’ve skilled occasional slowdowns when working with giant knowledge units, which could be irritating throughout busy occasions.

What G2 customers like about Deltek Costpoint:

“I do not like that with a view to reverse a previous bill, it’s important to reverse the entire invoices that got here after it. Not solely is that this time-consuming, but when fee updates occurred for the reason that subsequent invoices have been first posted, you can provide you with completely different totals when they’re re-calc’d. And if the shopper already paid these subsequent invoices, it actually complicates issues. I additionally want there was extra performance for collections – methods to inform us when it is time to observe up, a better character restrict, and so on. We ended up choosing a distinct device to trace assortment statuses.”

– Deltek Costpoint Evaluate, Deanna U. 

Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne felt like a dynamic ERP system that retains every little thing operating easily, irrespective of how advanced issues get. Its complete suite of options spans finance, manufacturing, gross sales, and distribution, giving me every little thing we have to handle operations in a single place.

The actual-time reporting and analytics are a standout for me. Having immediate insights into key efficiency indicators permits us to make choices with confidence, realizing we have now the information to again them up. The seamless integration capabilities imply we don’t have to fret about disconnected programs or guide knowledge entry—it’s all linked, environment friendly, and dependable. I additionally love how sturdy and secure the system is, dealing with our enterprise’s development and complexity with ease.

The implementation course of required time, sources, and experience to get every little thing arrange appropriately. And whereas the system’s performance is unbelievable, it has a steep studying curve. It took thorough coaching to get our group snug utilizing it successfully. 

We additionally seen Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne turns into a considerable funding with licensing charges, customizations, and ongoing upkeep. 

What I dislike about Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne:

• Setting it up was a serious mission that required important time, sources, and experience, making the method difficult for our group.
• The system’s huge performance meant our group wanted in depth coaching, and the licensing, customization, and upkeep prices make it a big funding.

What G2 customers dislike about Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne:

“Whereas Oracle JD Edwards could be custom-made to satisfy particular enterprise wants, it requires extra time and sources to make the mandatory modifications. This generally is a problem for companies with restricted sources.”

– Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Evaluate, Kaushal Z.

Utilizing Odoo ERP made us really feel like having a completely customizable and versatile system at our fingertips.

From a technical perspective, Odoo’s open-source nature is a large benefit. It allowed us to customise workflows, dashboards, and even the core performance to satisfy our particular wants. The system is constructed on Python, and whereas we wanted expert builders to fine-tune some options, the customization choices have been almost limitless. We run Odoo on a Linux-based setting, which we’ve discovered to be essentially the most secure and environment friendly setup. Whereas it could actually function on Home windows, Linux gave us higher efficiency and neighborhood help, which is a big bonus.

To get one of the best efficiency, we’ve had to make sure our {hardware} meets Odoo’s necessities. For smaller deployments with as much as 10 customers, a dual-core CPU, 2 GB of RAM, and 10 GB of storage are ample. Nonetheless, as our operations expanded, we scaled as much as a quad-core CPU, 16 GB of RAM, and 50 GB of storage to deal with bigger datasets and extra customers. 

We felt that implementing the system was a fancy course of that required planning and technical experience, particularly when integrating third-party purposes or customizing the supply code. Its in depth performance meant we needed to make investments time in coaching our group to make use of it successfully. Moreover, whereas the interface is user-friendly, we’ve sometimes skilled slowdowns when dealing with giant knowledge volumes, which could be irritating.

Buyer help has been hit and miss for us. Whereas there’s loads of community-driven assist accessible, official help can generally be inconsistent, which made resolving crucial points a bit difficult. 

What I dislike about Odoo ERP:

• It required us technical experience and numerous planning, particularly when integrating third-party purposes or customizing options.
• Whereas the neighborhood is useful, I’ve discovered the official help to be hit and miss, which could be irritating after I run into crucial points.

What G2 customers dislike about Odoo ERP:

“Though Odoo ERP is very customizable, the method could be advanced and requires a very good understanding of each the platform and its underlying code. For companies with out in-house technical experience, this will result in reliance on exterior builders, which can improve prices and time for implementation.”

– Odoo ERP Evaluate, Khurshid A.

SAP Enterprise ByDesign‘s cloud-native structure supplies unmatched scalability.

It lets us add customers, modules, and functionalities as our enterprise grows while not having important {hardware} investments. The system is designed to deal with advanced workflows and provides sturdy knowledge safety, adhering to strict compliance requirements, which is reassuring for delicate enterprise operations.

I admire how the embedded analytics instruments ship real-time insights by way of customizable dashboards, enabling us to watch key efficiency indicators (KPIs) and acquire deeper visibility into operations. 

Efficiency-wise, SAP Enterprise ByDesign typically handles duties effectively, however I’ve encountered occasional slowdowns, notably when processing giant datasets or operating advanced queries. I’ve discovered these efficiency points to be irritating throughout crucial operations, requiring technical changes or help. 

What I dislike about SAP Enterprise ByDesign:

• Whereas the system is flexible, I’ve discovered the customization choices a bit restrictive, which generally requires workarounds or exterior integrations to satisfy particular wants.
• Often, I skilled slowdowns with giant datasets, and the pricing can really feel steep, particularly for smaller companies, making it a big funding.

What G2 customers dislike about SAP Enterprise ByDesign:

“SAP Enterprise ByDesign does lack in fast buyer help for any points confronted. Regardless that virtually all points are solved, the help has typically taken a very long time to reply to complaints raised by our organisation. This may trigger frustration.”

– SAP Enterprise ByDesign Evaluate, Syed Umer W.

Seeking to implement ERP? Be taught one of the best practices to observe for ERP implementation.