9 Finest Authorized Case Administration Software program for Regulation Companies: My Overview

I’m not a lawyer, however I do know that working a regulation agency isn’t nearly successful circumstances. It’s about maintaining the whole lot organized behind the scenes. And from what I’ve seen, authorized case administration software program could make or break that course of.

Whereas researching the most effective authorized case administration software program, I encountered most of the similar challenges authorized professionals talk about: small corporations drowning in paper recordsdata, and emails paralegals juggling exhausting drives and whiteboards, and consultants tasked with selecting software program with out a lot route. Everybody needs one thing that’s simple to make use of, constructed for his or her apply space, and, let’s be trustworthy, not ridiculously costly.

For those who’re in the identical boat, I’ve performed the analysis. Whether or not you are a solo legal professional, a part of a rising agency, or making an attempt to get your case administration out of spreadsheets, listed below are the highest authorized case administration software program choices price contemplating.

9 finest authorized case administration software program I like to recommend

From my conversations with authorized professionals, I’ve heard how simply issues can change into chaotic with no dependable system—missed courtroom dates, misplaced recordsdata, or scrambling to search out key case notes. The fitting software program helps forestall that, giving corporations a solution to keep organized and targeted on their shoppers as a substitute of administrative complications.

However the most effective authorized case administration software program isn’t nearly group; it’s about making every day duties extra environment friendly. The authorized professionals I talked to emphasised the significance of automation to generate paperwork, sync with courtroom calendars, and deal with time monitoring and billing. For small corporations particularly, the place attorneys put on a number of hats, these options save invaluable time and scale back handbook work.

Finally, the best software program depends upon what a agency wants most, whether or not that’s higher billing instruments, a safe shopper portal, or integrations with present methods. The perfect choices assist authorized groups keep organized, work extra effectively, and spend much less time on administrative duties.

What makes the most effective authorized case administration software program?

As I researched totally different platforms, I evaluated them based mostly on key elements that matter most to authorized professionals. Right here’s what I checked out:

• Case administration and monitoring: At its core, a authorized case administration system ought to make it simple to handle circumstances, shoppers, and associated paperwork in a single place. I checked out how every software organizes case recordsdata, tracks matter progress, and hyperlinks associated contacts, paperwork, and duties. The perfect software program permits customers to rapidly retrieve case historical past, assign duties, and observe updates in actual time with out leaping between a number of methods.
• Scheduling and docketing: Missed deadlines will be disastrous for a regulation agency, so I targeted on how properly these platforms deal with scheduling. The perfect instruments supply built-in docketing options, automated reminders, and integrations with courtroom guidelines and calendars. I additionally checked in the event that they assist jurisdiction-based deadline calculations, which is especially vital for litigation-focused corporations.
• Billing and accounting: A authorized case administration system ought to make it simple to trace billable hours, generate invoices, and handle shopper funds. I evaluated whether or not the software program included time monitoring, each handbook and computerized, expense monitoring, and customizable billing buildings akin to flat price, contingency, and hourly. I additionally checked out whether or not the software program integrates with accounting instruments like QuickBooks or Xero, which many corporations depend on for monetary administration.
• Doc administration and automation: Doc-heavy workflows are a actuality for regulation corporations, so I examined how every platform handles doc storage, group, and automation. The perfect instruments permit customers to add, categorize, and search paperwork simply whereas providing options like model management, e-signatures, and safe client-sharing portals. Some platforms additionally present doc automation, letting corporations generate contracts and authorized types with pre-filled shopper knowledge to avoid wasting time on repetitive duties.
• Consumer communication and portals: Many corporations battle with shopper communication, so I regarded for software program that provides built-in messaging, e mail integration, and safe shopper portals. The perfect platforms present a central place for attorneys and shoppers to trade messages, share paperwork, and observe case progress with out counting on unsecured emails or a number of third-party instruments.
• Safety and compliance: Since regulation corporations deal with delicate shopper data, safety was a high precedence in my analysis. I checked whether or not the software program used encryption, multi-factor authentication, and role-based entry controls. I additionally checked out compliance with business laws akin to ABA pointers, HIPAA for corporations dealing with health-related circumstances, and GDPR for corporations with worldwide shoppers.
• Integrations and scalability: A regulation agency’s tech stack typically contains accounting software program, e-discovery instruments, and e mail platforms, so I examined whether or not these case administration instruments combine with important third-party companies. I additionally thought-about scalability, whether or not the software program can assist a rising agency by including customers, apply areas, or superior options with out disrupting operations.

The record under accommodates actual consumer critiques from the authorized case administration software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Help regulation corporations with getting into, storing, and discovering case and shopper data
• Present time monitoring or workflow instruments to help attorneys by means of the case lifecycle

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.

Clio is likely one of the hottest names in authorized tech, and after digging into it, I can see why. From the second I logged in, the dashboard felt intuitive. The whole lot from creating job lists and calendar occasions to billing metrics is specified by a manner that is sensible.

Organising a brand new case, including contacts, and managing paperwork was easy, which is one thing I do know authorized professionals recognize. Plenty of customers spotlight how simple Clio is to make use of, and I’d agree. It doesn’t take lengthy to get conversant in the platform.

One factor that stood out is how Clio handles job administration. Creating duties and assigning them to a selected matter and to a paralegal or legal professional is seamless. The interface makes it simple to set priorities, due dates, and job sorts with out feeling clunky.

I additionally examined Clio’s matter templates, that are helpful for corporations that deal with related kinds of circumstances repeatedly. Nevertheless, including customized fields and getting the templates prepared will take a while, particularly if you’re a big agency dealing with totally different authorized issues. 

I additionally like its shopper portal characteristic, which provides authorized groups a safe solution to talk and share paperwork with shoppers. It gives cell apps as properly, which is an added benefit. 

From what I noticed, Clio’s billing and accounting options cowl the fundamentals, however they might not be sufficient for corporations that want extra superior accounts administration. It handles billable hours, invoicing, and unpaid payments, however some customers have famous that its bookkeeping capabilities are restricted.On the brilliant aspect, Clio does combine with QuickBooks and different accounting instruments, which helps fill the gaps.

Additionally, from what I heard from different customers, Clio’s customization choices might be extra versatile. Some authorized professionals talked about that they want extra management over the dashboard, experiences, workflows, and different options to raised match their agency’s particular wants. However this isn’t a dealbreaker in my opinion.

On the entire, I would say Clio is an all-in-one software that’s finest for regulation corporations in search of an easy-to-use platform to handle circumstances, billing, and shopper communication in a single place. You’ll be able to attempt Clio freely for 7-days. 

What I dislike about Clio:

• Whereas Clio handles billing properly, its bookkeeping instruments aren’t as strong, and plenty of corporations nonetheless want separate accounting software program.
• I observed that Clio doesn’t supply a lot flexibility in tailoring experiences, workflows, or doc templates to suit distinctive agency wants.

What G2 customers dislike about Clio: 

“I might like to see extra customization choices, notably the power to cover options we do not use, akin to time entry and hourly billing. Streamlining the interface for our particular wants would make it much more intuitive and tailor-made to our apply.”

– Clio Overview, Lauren M, Paralegal/Authorized Assistant. 

After I first regarded into Filevine, I may inform it was constructed for regulation corporations that want extra than simply primary case monitoring. It’s identified for its automation, customizable workflows, and in-depth reporting, making it an amazing match for corporations that wish to set up their operations and keep on high of each element. 

I favored that Filevine takes a challenge administration method, treating each case or matter as a challenge. This implies regulation corporations can arrange structured workflows, add paperwork, assign duties with deadlines, and observe progress in a manner that feels extra organized. 

Customization is one other sturdy level. Not like some platforms that really feel inflexible, Filevine permits corporations to tailor workflows and processes to match their particular wants. For instance, if I wish to handle circumstances associated to private damage, I can arrange a selected challenge template with customized fields for such issues.

I can create job flows that can mechanically assign totally different duties because the case strikes ahead to respective group members, ranging from assigning it to assistants for filling up shopper contact playing cards and case particulars to assigning it to attorneys and attorneys, producing paperwork for communication, and extra. 

The report builder is a significant spotlight in keeping with me, giving corporations a solution to pull helpful insights with out counting on exterior instruments. You’ll be able to create experiences to see a listing of duties due or a listing of tasks per legal professional, and so forth. 

There are some drawbacks too. From what I noticed, Filevine’s search performance might be extra intuitive. I noticed some customers mentioning that discovering shopper data or case particulars isn’t all the time simple, particularly if names are misspelled or entered barely in a different way. A extra versatile and clever search system would make it simpler to retrieve data rapidly, which is important for managing giant caseloads effectively.

I additionally observed some customers reporting that Filevine can really feel sluggish at instances, particularly when dealing with importing paperwork or having too many home windows open. It’s not a significant disadvantage in itself since cloud-based apps will be finicky at instances, however it’s one thing to contemplate. 

Total, if I had been working a mid-to-large-sized regulation agency that wanted a structured, data-driven system, Filevine could be excessive on my record. I believe it really works particularly properly for corporations dealing with complicated litigation, private damage, or any apply that depends on detailed case monitoring and reporting.

Filevine offers a 14-day free trial on request. 

What I disliked about Filevine:

• From what I’ve seen, discovering shopper data or case particulars isn’t all the time easy. A extra versatile search system would make retrieving data faster and simpler.
• Filevine has many nice options, however I noticed some customers point out that the platform can lag when engaged on too many tabs or when importing paperwork, which isn’t perfect when juggling a number of circumstances.

What G2 customers dislike about Filevine:

“Accessing shoppers within the tackle e book. For instance, while you attempt to search for a shopper within the tackle e book or the ‘Seek for Undertaking’ part, should you misspell the shopper identify, even by one letter, it should pull up a listing of irrelevant names, names that are not even near what I sort in. I discover this odd and intensely inefficient.” 

– Filevine Overview, Olivia B, Consumption Division Coordinator. 

 I’ve heard so much about Needles, a type of legacy case administration methods that many regulation corporations relied on for years. For those who’ve ever used it, you in all probability understand it all the time obtained the job performed, however it wasn’t cloud-based authorized software program. And that is the place Neos is available in. From what I gathered, it’s primarily Needles reimagined for the cloud. 

One of many first issues I observed about Neos is how a lot smoother it feels. The navigation is clear, the workflows make sense, and it doesn’t take lengthy to determine the place issues are. The left-hand menu retains the whole lot inside attain so that you’re not digging by means of layers of menus simply to search out what you want.

It additionally helps that the buyer assist is stable. From what I heard from most customers, the group is responsive and useful after they want help, which is one thing I do know could make or break a agency’s expertise with a brand new system.

One factor I actually like about Neos is how versatile it’s when it involves reporting and analytics. Plenty of authorized case administration instruments provide you with primary, cookie-cutter experiences, however Neos really lets corporations customise experiences to trace the metrics that matter most with its superior search characteristic. 

That mentioned, efficiency will be a problem, based mostly on what I noticed from different consumer critiques. Some customers have reported gradual load instances, which could not be perfect while you’re knee-deep in casework 

Bugs and glitches are one other frustration. Some customers have reported surprising errors that disrupt their workflow, which will be irritating should you’re in the course of a high-priority job. It’s not a relentless difficulty, however it does occur typically sufficient that corporations ought to pay attention to it. Additionally, from what I’ve seen, there generally is a slight studying curve at first.  

Regardless of these drawbacks, Neos remains to be a robust selection for corporations that want a contemporary, customizable case administration system. In case you have been a Needles consumer beforehand, you may undoubtedly contemplate Neos for an improve to cloud-based case administration software program. 

What I dislike about Meeting Neos:

• I’ve observed experiences of lag, crashes, and surprising bugs, particularly after updates. While you’re deep into casework, ready for the system to catch up might not be perfect.
• Whereas it’s user-friendly when you get used to it, the educational curve generally is a bit steep, particularly for corporations switching over from Needles or one other case administration system.

What G2 customers dislike about Meeting Neos:

“Cell software just isn’t obtainable, hope they may launch cell software of HelloFax. So, as a substitute of sending phone-scanned recordsdata to the pc, I can instantly fax them by way of cell.” 

– Meeting Neos Overview, Stella N.

After I first regarded into MyCase, I may inform instantly why so many authorized professionals depend on it. It’s not making an attempt to be an excessively complicated, all-in-one enterprise resolution. However it’s constructed to make case administration, billing, and shopper communication simpler for regulation corporations with out the headache of a steep studying curve. And truthfully, that’s precisely what plenty of corporations want.

The very first thing that stood out to me is how intuitive it feels. Including contacts and circumstances, setting the platform with workflow and duties, and speaking securely with shoppers are all easy. It might deal with the whole lot from shopper consumption to monitoring deadlines, managing billing, and securely speaking with shoppers.

The battle examine characteristic when including a brand new case stunned me as a result of not each case administration software contains this built-in. It’s a small however essential operate that helps corporations keep away from moral points earlier than they even begin engaged on a case.

Certainly one of MyCase’s greatest strengths, in my opinion, is how properly it handles shopper communication. The built-in shopper portal and safe messaging make it a lot simpler to remain in contact with shoppers. An added benefit is integration with LawPay at no further price. 

That being mentioned, MyCase isn’t excellent.  One of many greatest drawbacks I observed from different customers is MyCase’s restricted e mail integration. Some customers talked about points with syncing emails and calendars, which may make it more durable to handle duties and scheduling in a single place. 

I additionally observed some consumer suggestions about billing and accounting. Some customers talked about that accounting options will be complicated to grasp, and a few options, like getting itemized payments and monitoring invoices, can require extra steps. This might not be a problem for each regulation agency, however it’s price contemplating.

Nonetheless, my case for MyCase is that For those who run a small or mid-sized agency with 2 to 50 practitioners, MyCase is a stable selection for maintaining billing, shopper communication, and case administration multi function place with out the trouble.

MyCase gives a 10-day free trial. 

What I dislike about MyCase: 

•  Some customers talked about that syncing with e mail suppliers just isn’t seamless, which will be irritating when making an attempt to maintain up with emails and calendars.
• Whereas the invoicing and funds work properly, I’ve seen some consumer complaints about accounting options being exhausting to grasp and navigate. 

What G2 customers dislike about MyCase: 

“The e-mail integration just isn’t very useful, needing fixed handbook evaluation.” 

– MyCase Overview, Mariana P, Paralegal. 

In case your agency handles private damage circumstances, CASEpeer doesn’t make you bend over backward to make it work. It’s constructed for the job proper out of the field.

I noticed no have to spend hours organising customized fields, templates, and workflows like I must with most different authorized case administration methods. It has the whole lot you want multi function place to make PI case administration so simple as potential. 

The dashboard provides a fast snapshot of their caseload. Immediately, you see open circumstances, duties, settlement calls for, and deposits—the whole lot that issues while you’re managing high-volume PI claims. It’s not making an attempt to be a one-size-fits-all system, and truthfully, that’s an excellent factor in my view. 

The consumption course of is detailed, making certain that each piece of shopper data is captured from the beginning. In case your agency thrives on workflows and case milestones, CASEpeer does an amazing job maintaining the whole lot in examine.

One of many issues I recognize is the way it simplifies medical data and lien monitoring. As an alternative of juggling spreadsheets or digging by means of emails, all that data is true within the system, making it simpler to observe up on excellent data or bills.

However it’s not with out some limitations based mostly on what I gathered from different consumer experiences. The interface can really feel inflexible at instances. Whereas it’s nice for structured case monitoring, it doesn’t permit for a lot customization in workflows or case administration exterior of its predefined construction. In case your agency handles a mixture of case sorts past private damage, you would possibly discover it a little bit limiting.

Additionally, whereas CASEpeer gives important integrations, some customers really feel it might be extra strong, particularly concerning third-party compatibility. 

Nonetheless, for private damage corporations that need an organized, workflow-driven system that makes case monitoring, medical data administration, and settlements simpler, I would say CASEpeer delivers. In case your agency matches that mould, it’s price a glance.

Please notice that CASEpeer and MyCase are each owned by AffiniPay, the dad or mum firm of LawPay.

What I dislike about CASEpeer:

• Based mostly on my analysis, in case your agency handles different apply areas alongside private damage, you would possibly end up wishing for extra customization choices..
• I want the integrations had been a bit extra easy. CASEpeer covers the fundamentals, however should you’re in search of nice compatibility with third-party instruments, you would possibly run into some limitations.

What G2 customers dislike about CASEpeer:

“We want there was extra flexibility in a number of the classes. For example, it has set subjects for notes, and it might be significantly better for us if we may create our personal subjects as there are particular subjects lacking – i.e., Medical Payments. Additionally, we have struggled with sure Integrations akin to Quickbooks.” 

– CASEpeer Overview, Verified G2 consumer in authorized companies. 

Litify just isn’t a typical authorized case administration software program I’ve seen. It’s constructed on Salesforce, which implies it’s filled with enterprise-level CRM options, automation, and reporting instruments that many regulation corporations don’t often get entry to.

From my analysis, Litify is likely one of the few platforms that delivers customization for various authorized practices, be it private damage, insurance coverage protection, immigration,  claims litigation and chapter regulation corporations or company authorized for enterprises. 

Throughout my product tour, I used to be impressed by how well-structured the whole lot was. Beginning with detailed consumption types and automatic workflows that effortlessly transfer circumstances from emails to shoppers for eSignature to billing and matter administration, the whole lot felt streamlined, decreasing the necessity for handbook follow-ups.

What actually stood out to me was the real-time analytics, which gave perception into case high quality and high-priority issues, serving to corporations rapidly establish pressing circumstances and allocate assets the place they’re wanted most.

One other standout for me was the facility of reporting and analytics. Litify enables you to observe case progress, agency efficiency, and financials intimately.

That mentioned, Litify just isn’t an out-of-the-box, plug-and-play resolution. As a result of it’s constructed on Salesforce, the setup course of will be prolonged and complex, particularly for corporations that don’t have already got Salesforce expertise from what I noticed. It’s extremely customizable, however that additionally means it requires extra effort and time to configure the whole lot the best way you need.

I’ve seen some customers say that the educational curve is steep, which is sensible, given how a lot it will possibly do. For those who’re coming from a extra easy case administration software, count on to spend a while getting used to the system.

I would say Litify is a superb selection for giant, rising corporations that desire a highly effective, scalable system with deep reporting and automation. Additionally, if you’re an enterprise in search of a software to handle your company authorized issues, you may contemplate Litify, particularly should you already use Salesforce in your stack. 

What I dislike about Litify: 

• Based mostly on my observations, Litify just isn’t one thing you may simply begin utilizing instantly. Onboarding and configuring it proper to fit your wants takes time.
• Getting comfy with the system takes time. Given its characteristic set and the customization, corporations might have in depth coaching to totally use it in my opinion. 

What G2 customers dislike about Litify: 

“It takes so much to implement, so be ready to take a position time and assets.“

– Litify Overview, Emery W, CEO. 

For those who’re a small or mid-sized regulation agency, Smokeball is a type of instruments that may make your day-to-day work really feel rather less chaotic. It’s constructed to maintain circumstances, paperwork, and billing organized whereas mechanically monitoring your time within the background, so that you’re not always stopping to log each e mail or telephone name.

The automated time monitoring with AutoTime is one thing that caught my consideration. Plenty of platforms require you to manually observe hours or depend on a timer, however Smokeball does it within the background, so that you don’t have to consider it. For corporations that invoice by the hour, that is excellent.

One other factor I favored was its doc automation. Smokeball has over 20,000 authorized type templates which are prepared to make use of and mechanically pull in knowledge while you open it for a matter. That form of effectivity makes a distinction, particularly for corporations that cope with a excessive quantity of circumstances. And the integrations are stable, and so is their buyer assist, which isn’t all the time a given with authorized case administration instruments

In fact, no software program is ideal. I did see some customers noting that their billing may use some enhancements. Whereas it covers the fundamentals, extra options like break up billings may make invoicing and billing significantly better. 

Additionally, there generally is a little bit of a studying curve. Whereas Smokeball is mostly simple to make use of, some options take time to get comfy with, particularly for corporations switching from one other system. When you get the hold of it, although, it appears to run easily.

That being mentioned, should you’re in search of a software that helps you seize extra billable hours with out including further work, Smokeball is certainly price contemplating.

What I dislike about Smokeball:

• Whereas Smokeball does an excellent job of monitoring billable time, I’ve seen customers point out challenges with billing and invoicing, and in search of extra enhancements in these areas.
• It’s a well-designed system, however there’s a little bit of a studying curve from what I noticed. This isn’t a dealbreaker per se however one thing to contemplate earlier than implementing.

What G2 customers dislike about Smokeball:

“I don’t like that they have not added a break up billing choice for when the bill must be break up between events, akin to GAL shoppers. Additionally, it is a minor factor, however though Smokeball does combine with Phrase, it doesn’t have the autocorrect characteristic, and a number of the formatting choices obtainable in all elements of Smokeball, such because the memos space (the place we do preserve plenty of our notes). We might like to see that added.” 

– Smokeball evaluation, Mandy L, Workplace Supervisor.

Now, Legistify is not conventional authorized case administration software program however reasonably a authorized software designed for in-house authorized groups and enterprises. It’s constructed to assist firms observe litigation, handle contracts, and keep on high of authorized issues with no need to depend on spreadsheets or outdated methods. I would recommend you skip this and transfer to the following choice if you’re a regulation agency.

In my opinion, the power to observe litigation throughout totally different places, generate experiences, and have a single supply of reality for all authorized issues makes it notably helpful for firms that cope with frequent disputes or regulatory oversight.

Every of the dashboards, be it for contract or litigation administration or for mental property administration, is well-structured, giving authorized groups an at-a-glance view of energetic circumstances, pending contracts, and upcoming deadlines.

One other standout characteristic is contract administration. As an alternative of sifting by means of emails and shared drives to search out the newest contract model, the whole lot is saved in a single place with easy accessibility to key particulars like renewal dates, obligations, and related dangers. For enterprises dealing with a excessive quantity of contracts, this will save a ton of time and scale back authorized publicity from missed deadlines or outdated agreements.

Nevertheless, I did see some customers point out technical points that may make the expertise irritating at instances. Some reported bugs, gradual load instances, and occasional glitches that disrupt workflows. One other criticism I noticed was a problem with OTP-based authentication. Some customers have discovered logging in with OTP each time will be annoying when making an attempt to entry the system rapidly.

Regardless of these minor drawbacks, Legistfy is a stable selection for large firms’ in-house authorized groups.  

What I dislike about Legistify:

• I’ve seen customers point out bugs, gradual load instances, and occasional glitches that disrupt workflows. When coping with important authorized knowledge, these hiccups will be irritating.
• I agree that safety is vital, however some customers reported points with repeated OTP-based login which makes it more durable to entry the system rapidly when they should get issues performed.

What G2 customers dislike about Legistify:  

“Though my group and I completely benefit from the software, at instances, there have been occasional experiences from customers of technical glitches, which may probably disrupt the litigation course of. The tech group is engaged on enhancing this.”

– Legistify Overview, Murali Krishna N, Head of Authorized Firm Secretary. 

From what I noticed, SmartAdvocate is a type of authorized case administration methods that packs plenty of energy beneath the hood, however it does take some getting used to.

Based mostly on what I discovered in my analysis, SmartAdvocate was initially designed by and for private damage and mass tort litigation corporations, however it’s clear that it has expanded far past that. Now, I see it being utilized by every kind of litigation corporations that want structured case monitoring, doc administration, and workflow automation.

One factor that stands out instantly is how properly it handles doc administration. For those who’ve ever struggled with maintaining case recordsdata organized or searching down the newest model of a doc, you’ll recognize the construction SmartAdvocate offers. The whole lot is centralized and simply accessible, which makes life simpler when juggling a number of circumstances.

The case monitoring and workflow administration options are additionally sturdy factors. It helps preserve the whole lot shifting ahead with job assignments, reminders, and structured workflows, which is precisely what corporations want when dealing with excessive volumes of litigation.

There are some minor drawbacks. One of many cons I observed from different customers is the educational curve. SmartAdvocate is feature-rich and customizable, which is nice in the long term however can really feel overwhelming at first. It takes time and coaching to totally perceive the right way to use it successfully.

Some customers have famous occasional gradual loading instances, however from what I noticed, this doesn’t appear to be a widespread difficulty. For essentially the most half, SmartAdvocate runs easily.

Total, I would say SmartAdvocate is a robust selection for corporations that want structured case administration, stable doc group, and dependable buyer assist, particularly should you deal with private damage or mass tort circumstances.

What I dislike about SmartAdvocate: 

• Based mostly on my observations, this isn’t a system you simply bounce into and immediately grasp. There’s a studying curve, and it takes a while to get absolutely comfy with all of the options.
• Whereas it’s not a dealbreaker, some customers have talked about occasional lag or gradual load instances. More often than not, it runs nice, however it’s one thing to concentrate on. 

What G2 customers dislike about SmartAdvocate:

“Not as intuitive because it might be, would recognize simplicity.”

– SmartAdvocate Overview, Alex D, Paralegal.  

For those who’re nonetheless exploring choices, NeoDeluxe, PracticePanther, eIMMIGRATION by Cerenade, and Provakil are additionally price contemplating, relying in your agency’s particular wants. 

Need the most effective of the most effective? Uncover the high authorized software program for 2025 based mostly on G2 consumer critiques and rankings.