10 Finest Thoughts Mapping Software program I Use to Arrange My Concepts

After I first began exploring thoughts mapping software program, it wasn’t nearly discovering instruments to arrange my ideas—I wanted options to rework chaotic concepts into structured plans.

Over time, I’ve relied on a number of the finest thoughts mapping software program to plan campaigns, define long-form content material, and strategize for crew tasks. Some fell quick, providing clunky interfaces or restricted performance, whereas others exceeded expectations with intuitive designs and sturdy options.

To actually perceive what totally different thoughts mapping instruments supply, I attempted 25+ choices to guage their usability, options, and general worth. From organising crew brainstorming classes to creating detailed undertaking blueprints, I’ve examined and used totally different thoughts mapping software program in my each day work to see how they carry out beneath totally different calls for. 

After a number of weeks of use, I’ve finalized my high ten options that really stand out.

10 finest thoughts mapping software program I examined (and beloved) 

After I take into consideration thoughts mapping software program, I see it as my go-to instrument for organizing ideas, brainstorming concepts, and visually structuring data. It is a digital strategy to create thoughts maps—diagrams that department out like a tree, connecting concepts, duties, or ideas in a transparent and visible format. 

As an alternative of scribbling on paper, I take advantage of these instruments to map out all the things from content material plans to non-public tasks shortly. They assist me see connections, prioritize duties, and switch scattered concepts into actionable plans, all whereas holding issues visually partaking and straightforward to navigate.

Whether or not you’re a visible thinker, a undertaking supervisor, or simply somebody trying to manage your ideas extra successfully, I hope my firsthand perspective will aid you discover the right instrument to your wants.

What makes a thoughts mapping instrument price it? My take

For me, a thoughts mapping instrument is price investing time (and generally cash) into if it checks a number of crucial bins. Right here’s what I prioritized whereas evaluating these instruments:

• Ease of use: A thoughts mapping instrument needs to be intuitive. If I have to spend hours determining add nodes or rearrange branches, it’s already misplaced me. Simplicity is vital, particularly when attempting to get concepts down shortly.
• Customization: Each undertaking is totally different, and I want a instrument that lets me alter colours, layouts, and codecs to suit the duty. Whether or not it’s a visual-heavy thoughts map for a presentation or a simple flowchart for inside use, flexibility is non-negotiable.
• Collaboration: A lot of my tasks contain groups, so instruments that make it straightforward to share thoughts maps, add feedback, or collaborate in real-time get a serious thumbs up. A shared visible area fosters creativity and retains everybody aligned.
• Cross-platform accessibility: I don’t all the time work from the identical machine, so I want instruments which can be cloud-based or supply seamless syncing between desktop, cellular, and internet variations. This ensures I can decide up the place I left off, regardless of the place I’m.
• Worth for cash: Some instruments supply free plans with sturdy options, whereas others cost a premium for fundamental capabilities. I made positive to weigh the fee in opposition to the worth delivered. If a free instrument does all the things I want, it’s a win. For paid instruments, they higher justify the funding with superior options or a superior consumer expertise.

These components guided my course of and helped separate a “nice-to-have” instrument from a real productiveness enhancer. Whether or not you’re mapping out advanced workflows, simplifying note-taking, or collaborating with a crew, my checklist of finest thoughts mapping software program incorporates choices that cater to numerous wants and budgets.

To be included on this checklist, an answer should:

• Supply customers an open, editable workspace
• Present customers with instruments to file concepts and draw relationships between them in a diagram format
• Permit customers to save lots of and share their thoughts maps
• Particularly and deliberately facilitate the creation of thoughts maps

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations could have been edited for readability.  

After I first tried Miro, I knew it was greater than only a thoughts mapping instrument—it’s a full-fledged visible collaboration platform. Whereas its versatility can initially really feel overwhelming, it shortly turns into a bonus when you discover its intensive options. 

The thoughts mapping performance is glossy and intuitive. It provides drag-and-drop ease, pre-built templates, and an infinite canvas area that lets you increase your concepts with out limits.

One factor that units Miro aside for me is its deal with collaboration. Groups can work collectively in actual time, leaving feedback, voting on concepts, or chatting straight throughout the platform. This makes it a wonderful alternative for distant brainstorming classes or workshops. Its integrations with instruments like Slack, Asana, and Jira imply you possibly can simply join your thoughts maps to broader workflows.

Whereas Miro’s free plan is beneficiant—providing limitless crew members and as much as three editable boards—its premium plans unlock superior options like personal boards and customized templates. 

Nonetheless, the expertise isn’t with out its challenges. The platform’s intensive characteristic set made the educational curve steeper than anticipated, particularly once I was initially on the lookout for one thing simple. I additionally seen that engaged on bigger or extra advanced boards may result in occasional efficiency lags, which interrupted my workflow. And since Miro depends closely on an web connection, I discovered it limiting once I wanted to work offline.

Personally, I discovered the educational curve price it for the sheer flexibility it gives. For these prepared to speculate the time to grasp it, Miro provides unmatched flexibility and collaboration options, making it a standout possibility for each particular person and team-driven thoughts mapping and undertaking planning.

What I dislike about Miro:

• Though Miro is comparatively user-friendly, there’s nonetheless a little bit of a studying curve relating to extra superior options.
•  The free model is kind of restricted for greater groups, so upgrading to a paid plan may turn out to be needed.

What G2 customers dislike about Miro:

“I wish to see extra protocol templates within the free model. When you can copy and paste textual content simply, it will be nice to format protocols with a premade template straight on the board. Buyer help within the free model can be not complete, solely accessible to paid members.”

– Miro Evaluate, Kathryn L. 

ClickUp’s complete platform integrates thoughts mapping with undertaking administration, making it a strong alternative for groups who want each planning and execution in a single place. I discovered its thoughts mapping characteristic extremely versatile, particularly for visualizing tasks inside broader workflows.

What stood out for me was ClickUp’s means to mix thoughts mapping with detailed undertaking administration instruments. You possibly can create a thoughts map to brainstorm concepts, seamlessly transition into process creation, set deadlines, and assign tasks—all throughout the identical platform. It’s excellent for turning brainstorming classes into concrete plans with out switching between totally different instruments.

ClickUp additionally excels with its customization choices. I may alter all the things from a map’s look to how data is displayed, guaranteeing that my thoughts maps match my crew’s fashion. As well as, its collaboration options are top-notch, providing real-time enhancing, process feedback, and doc sharing to maintain everybody aligned. 

Nonetheless, the expertise isn’t with out its challenges. The sheer variety of options was a bit overwhelming initially, and it took me a while to really feel snug navigating all the things. Though I appreciated the customization, setting all of it up was tedious, particularly once I wished to begin shortly. I additionally bumped into some efficiency hiccups when engaged on bigger, extra advanced maps—they appeared to gradual the platform down. 

Regardless of these challenges, I discovered ClickUp’s means to mix brainstorming with execution extremely priceless. It’s a instrument I’d suggest for anybody who wants a flexible, all-in-one answer for crew tasks.

What I dislike about ClickUp:

• Since ClickUp is primarily a undertaking administration instrument, its thoughts mapping characteristic could not really feel as polished or intuitive as devoted thoughts mapping software program.
• The amount of customization and settings generally slowed me down, particularly when attempting to shortly map out a easy concept.

What G2 customers dislike about ClickUp:

“There are too many bugs, even on the enterprise plan. You work together with many individuals from buyer help, and help does not care. Many bugs can be confirmed as unattended conduct, however it’ll take weeks and months till they resolve even crucial bugs. Additionally, the truth that it’s pushing to a one-in answer signifies that all the things is there, however nothing is actually “industry-leading” itself.”

– ClickUp Evaluate, Enrico Luca Okay.

Lucid’s Visible Collaboration Suite is a strong instrument designed for groups to brainstorm, plan, and execute tasks in a visible format.

I used to be significantly impressed by how seamlessly it integrates thoughts mapping with different forms of visible collaboration, resembling flowcharts and course of diagrams. This multi-faceted strategy makes it excellent for groups on the lookout for a complete instrument past thoughts mapping.

One of many standout options for me was Lucid’s intuitive drag-and-drop interface. The thoughts mapping instrument is straightforward to select up, and I may shortly create organized, visually partaking maps with out feeling slowed down by sophisticated settings or options. The templates are various, masking all the things from brainstorming classes to undertaking roadmaps, so that you don’t have to begin from scratch.

Nonetheless, I did encounter a number of drawbacks throughout my time with Lucid. First, the free model has restricted storage and performance, which could be irritating if you wish to use it for bigger tasks. The paid plans unlock extra options, however the pricing may very well be steep, particularly for groups on a price range.

One other concern I confronted was that whereas the platform is straightforward for creating maps, navigating via extra advanced or large-scale tasks may turn out to be cumbersome. The interface can get cluttered, particularly when a number of crew members contribute to a undertaking. I additionally seen that Lucid isn’t as responsive on cellular units, making it a problem to replace maps or collaborate.

What I dislike about Lucid Visible Collaboration Suite:

• Some superior options, like further templates and premium integrations, are solely out there within the paid plans.
• When coping with bigger, extra advanced thoughts maps, I seen that Lucid can generally lag or decelerate. This may very well be a dealbreaker in the event you’re engaged on large-scale tasks.

What G2 customers dislike about Lucid Visible Collaboration Suite:

“I’ve to open Lucid in incognito mode as a result of it doesn’t load correctly in customary Google Chrome. Though it really works in different browsers, I primarily use Chrome, which provides inconvenience. Moreover, it’s irritating to have to regulate the font dimension and shade settings each time manually. Lastly, it will be higher if solely the doc creator may disguise or unhide content material for higher management and group.”

– Lucid Visible Collaboration Suite Evaluate, Cindy C.

Throughout my hands-on testing, I used to be struck by how FigJam fosters creativity and collaboration via an intuitive, whiteboard-like expertise. Whereas it’s a wonderful thoughts mapping instrument, what actually units FigJam aside is its deal with spontaneity and real-time collaboration, making it ultimate for groups on the lookout for a extra dynamic strategy to brainstorming.

A singular side of FigJam is its extremely interactive nature. Customers can draw, add sticky notes, create shapes, and use emoticons to react to one another’s concepts. I discovered this an attractive strategy to brainstorm and hold the vitality up in crew conferences or collaborative classes.

You too can make the most of FigJam’s “cursor chat,” which permits real-time conversations straight on the thoughts map, making it really feel like a dwell dialogue round a bodily whiteboard.

Certainly one of my favourite options is its seamless integration with Figma. Should you’re already utilizing Figma for design work, FigJam turns into a pure extension for brainstorming and planning. It lets you transition simply from thoughts mapping to detailed design work with out leaping between platforms.

The free model of FigJam gives ample performance for many customers. Nonetheless, the paid plan unlocks limitless boards, superior integrations, and enhanced collaboration instruments. One other downside I discovered was that, because of the platform’s interactive nature, issues can get a bit chaotic when too many individuals are actively contributing without delay. The format can turn out to be cluttered shortly, particularly on bigger boards, which makes it tougher to deal with an important concepts.

I additionally seen that FigJam doesn’t supply as a lot customization for the way the thoughts maps are structured in comparison with different instruments. Whereas it’s straightforward to create visually partaking maps, I discovered the dearth of flexibility a bit limiting once I wished to construction maps extra particularly.

General, FigJam fosters creativity and collaboration, making it excellent for groups that thrive on real-time interplay. Nonetheless, in the event you’re on the lookout for one thing with extra customization choices or a extra structured, targeted expertise, you may discover FigJam’s free model too limiting.

What I dislike about FigJam:

• When you can customise shapes, colours, and sticky notes, FigJam doesn’t supply the extent of deep customization you may discover in instruments constructed explicitly for thoughts mapping.
• I discovered the template assortment a bit extra restrictive than a number of the different thoughts mapping software program I examined.

What G2 customers dislike about FigJam:

“I want it had extra options from Figma and higher linked with bringing in wireframes from Figma. For instance, if I copy a wireframe over, I’ve minimal performance when making adjustments. I want I may merge cells within the desk and have one thing like auto-layout for the tables in order the information within the desk improve, the desk adjusts.”

– FigJam Evaluate, Chinelo N.

Mural’s thoughts mapping capabilities stand out for groups that worth structured creativity like mine. After I explored Mural, what impressed me essentially the most was the way it permits brainstorming in a pure but organized means. In contrast to instruments that lean too closely on freeform design, Mural strikes a steadiness by providing structured templates whereas permitting sufficient flexibility to adapt to your workflow.

One of many key options I appreciated was Mural’s deal with guided collaboration. It gives built-in frameworks, resembling design considering templates, technique planning boards, and thoughts mapping guides, which can be significantly helpful for groups navigating advanced tasks or decision-making processes. These instruments actively helped me steer brainstorming classes in a productive route.

One other spotlight is Mural’s emphasis on asynchronous collaboration. Not everybody works in real-time, and Mural understands this. I discovered the power to go away feedback, pin notes, or contribute concepts at any time extremely helpful for groups like mine throughout totally different time zones or juggling a number of priorities.

Mural additionally excels at partaking groups with its visible and interactive instruments. Options like voting, timers, and icebreaker workout routines make collaborative classes extra dynamic. It’s not nearly making a thoughts map however fostering engagement and creativity all through the method.

The free plan is ample for small groups or private tasks, however the paid variations unlock limitless murals, superior integrations, and enterprise-grade safety. I additionally seen that managing consumer permissions and entry in Mural may very well be cumbersome, particularly when collaborating with exterior companions or shoppers who want non permanent entry.

Should you’re on the lookout for a thoughts mapping instrument that does greater than aid you brainstorm—one that gives a structured, partaking platform for crew collaboration, Mural is a improbable alternative.

What I dislike about Mural:

• Managing bigger groups inside a single Mural can generally get chaotic.
• Understanding which templates finest fit your wants could take time, particularly for these new to structured collaboration.

What G2 customers dislike about Mural:

“When murals are at a sure scale, there are some efficiency points, and my laptop computer appears to decelerate. It’s only when workspaces are created too large, so it possibly extra of a consumer misuse, however I believe it may very well be someway optimized.”

– Mural Evaluate, Clara S. 

Padlet takes a singular strategy to thoughts mapping by providing a collaborative, digital corkboard expertise. In contrast to conventional thoughts mapping instruments that stick with nodes and branches, Padlet shines in its means to permit freeform brainstorming with visible and multimedia parts. 

After I examined Padlet, I discovered it particularly helpful for tasks that profit from mixing textual content, photographs, hyperlinks, and even movies in a single area—making it really feel extra like a artistic playground than a inflexible mapping instrument.

I’m a fan of Padlet’s simplicity. It’s extremely straightforward to arrange and use, even for first-time customers. You can begin with a clean canvas or select from pre-designed templates, then drag and drop objects to arrange your concepts. It feels intuitive, which makes it an incredible alternative for brainstorming classes or private thoughts maps.

One other characteristic I like about Padlet is its multimedia help. You’re not restricted to only textual content or shapes—you possibly can embed movies, add information, or hyperlink to exterior assets straight inside your map. This provides depth to your thoughts maps and is particularly useful for tasks that contain analysis or wealthy content material.

Collaboration on Padlet can be simple. You possibly can invite crew members to contribute in real-time or asynchronously. It provides a commenting characteristic that’s excellent for leaving suggestions or discussing concepts with out exterior communication instruments.

Whereas it excels in visible enchantment and adaptability, Padlet doesn’t combine as deeply into undertaking administration workflows as different instruments, making it much less ultimate in the event you’re on the lookout for one thing that connects seamlessly with process monitoring or undertaking planning software program. 

The free model is ample for easy tasks, however premium plans present further options like extra storage, privateness choices, and superior customization. Moreover, the free model does not help superior customization, so that you may really feel a bit restricted in the event you’re attempting to fine-tune the design or construction of your thoughts maps.

What I dislike about Padlet:

• Padlet is improbable for creativity however lacks superior options like auto-layout or hierarchical constructions that devoted thoughts mapping instruments supply.
• The premium plans are feature-rich however could get costly for smaller groups or people.

What G2 customers dislike about Padlet:

“The pricing plan. Solely three Padlets are allowed within the free plan. If it is advisable create the fourth one, you will need to eradicate one of many three Padlets at hand. For an educator, dropping a Padlet is disastrous. Not all educators can afford the worth plan. If their colleges will not be funding them, they can’t afford Palet.”

– Padlet Evaluate, Mohamed S.

Freehand impressed me with its knack for facilitating brainstorming classes far past conventional thoughts mapping. Its deal with inclusive collaboration stood out due to options like voting, emoji reactions, and guided templates. 

These aren’t simply gimmicks—they turned brainstorming right into a genuinely partaking exercise that inspired everybody’s participation, even those that may be hesitant to talk up.

One characteristic I discovered significantly distinctive was the model historical past. It allowed me to revisit earlier iterations of a thoughts map, which is invaluable when an concept from an earlier section all of a sudden turns into related once more. Not all instruments supply this degree of flexibility, making me really feel extra assured experimenting with concepts.

One other standout was the presentation mode. After a session, I may seamlessly change from brainstorming to sharing a sophisticated map model with stakeholders. This eradicated the necessity to export or recreate visuals elsewhere, saving me time. For somebody juggling a number of duties, this was an enormous plus.

Freehand additionally strongly focuses on accessibility, with choices for display screen readers and a darkish mode that was simpler on my eyes throughout prolonged classes. Whereas different instruments cater primarily to visuals, Freehand ensures various groups can collaborate successfully.

Its freeform canvas makes it ultimate for mapping concepts, however I discovered it useful in creating workflows or easy storyboards. Freehand provides one thing distinct for groups in artistic industries or anybody on the lookout for a visually partaking strategy to brainstorm. 

Nonetheless, not like different instruments that permit for extra structured templates, Freehand’s totally freeform strategy may not be ultimate for customers preferring a extra organized, grid-like construction to their thoughts maps. Moreover, whereas the presentation mode is nice, it lacks a number of the superior design options out there in different instruments, that means you may have to do some additional work to shine maps for a proper presentation.

What I dislike about Freehand:

• If any crew isn’t snug with freeform visible instruments, they may battle to make use of them successfully.
• Sensible instruments like voting and integrations are behind the paywall, limiting smaller groups’ performance.

What G2 customers dislike about Freehand:

“There are lots of options and integrations we do not see a use for, so I am afraid of it turning into “an excessive amount of.” An enormous a part of the explanation I take advantage of Freehand is to insert screenshots for reference, and I do not like that I am unable to rotate them once I need to. We have now additionally seen that zooming out and in from the mousepad has not been working generally, which isn’t ultimate in conferences. I want I may see from a look which viewers are actively wanting on the board, not simply have it open in one in every of their internet tabs.”

– Freehand Evaluate, Tara H.

Gliffy focuses on diagramming precision and technical versatility. It’s not only for brainstorming; it’s additionally a powerhouse for creating detailed flowcharts, UML diagrams, and community structure visuals. After I examined Gliffy, I used to be impressed by its means to mix thoughts mapping with technical diagramming—excellent for when creativity meets construction.

For customers preferring templates, Gliffy doesn’t disappoint. It provides a variety tailor-made to totally different wants, whether or not you’re mapping out a product roadmap, a enterprise course of, or a undertaking workflow.

One other distinctive side is its integration with Confluence and Jira, which makes it a pure alternative for groups already utilizing Atlassian merchandise. I may embed thoughts maps straight into my Confluence pages or hyperlink them to Jira duties, streamlining collaboration with out leaping between platforms.

The revision historical past additionally stood out throughout my testing. It allowed me to see each change made to a map, making it straightforward to revert to earlier variations when wanted. This characteristic was a lifesaver for crew tasks, particularly when a number of contributors have been concerned. 

Gliffy’s emphasis on precision may make it much less interesting for purely artistic brainstorming, but it surely’s a top-tier alternative for structured and technical tasks. Nonetheless, its inflexible construction and technical focus make it much less appropriate for individuals who want a extra versatile or visually dynamic mind-mapping expertise.

One other downside is the restricted free plan. It provides fundamental performance however doesn’t present entry to superior options like bigger file storage or the total vary of templates, which could be restrictive for customers engaged on extra advanced or collaborative tasks. 

Moreover, Gliffy’s interface can really feel a bit dated and fewer intuitive in comparison with a number of the extra fashionable thoughts mapping instruments, which could make it tougher for brand new customers to leap into.

What I dislike about Gliffy:

• The fundamentals of this instrument are intuitive, however mastering a number of the technical diagramming instruments could take a while.

What G2 customers dislike about Gliffy:

“One downside of Gliffy is that its free model has restricted options and capabilities, which may be restrictive for customers who require superior performance or have to create all kinds of advanced diagrams. Upgrading to the paid model is critical to unlock the instrument’s full potential, which generally is a draw back for budget-conscious people or small groups.”

– Gliffy Evaluate, Elmi M.

After I used Klaxoon, I felt it was much less about organizing concepts and extra about sparking significant group conversations. It provides a contemporary strategy to thoughts mapping by specializing in crew engagement and interactive collaboration, making it a standout alternative for workshops, brainstorming classes, and hybrid groups. 

The brainstorming module was satisfying to make use of. It transforms conventional thoughts mapping into an attractive group exercise. As an alternative of merely connecting concepts, Klaxoon allowed my crew to contribute via textual content, photographs, or drawings, permitting everybody to specific themselves of their most well-liked means. This flexibility made it straightforward to assemble various views throughout my classes.

Klaxoon additionally excels with its dwell query characteristic, letting groups ask and reply questions in actual time. This characteristic was invaluable for breaking down advanced concepts and guaranteeing everybody was on the identical web page. Throughout one in every of my exams, I used it to make clear factors because the thoughts map developed, which stored the workflow easy and inclusive.

One other standout for me was Klaxoon’s assembly board integration. This bodily whiteboard syncs straight with Klaxoon’s digital instruments, bridging the hole between in-person and distant crew members. It’s not one thing I’ve seen in lots of different instruments, and made hybrid collaboration really feel seamless.

Whereas Klaxoon excels at group collaboration, its emphasis on interactive options can really feel overwhelming for solo tasks or extra simple use instances. Should you’re engaged on a simple mind-mapping process with out the necessity for intensive group interplay, Klaxoon could really feel unnecessarily advanced.

Moreover, the instrument’s interface generally is a bit busy, which could detract from the session’s focus, particularly for customers new to the platform.

Nonetheless, it is a high contender for groups trying to energize their brainstorming classes and foster engagement. 

What I dislike about Klaxoon:

• Whereas practical throughout the platform, exporting maps to different instruments or codecs was much less seamless than I’d hoped.
• With Klaxoon’s deal with interactivity, the instrument could also be extra appropriate for groups than solo customers.

What G2 customers dislike about Klaxoon:

“The one factor I’ve detected is that if you duplicate a board or a session, the ‘dwell questions’ will not be duplicated. And when I’ve added a ‘video’ to the outline of a ‘step’ in a mission or journey, generally it detects it as an error and doesn’t play it.”

– Klaxoon Evaluate, Wenceslao U.

Microsoft Visio is right for professionals who want precision, particularly for creating extremely structured diagrams and technical visualizations. In contrast to many different instruments I examined, Visio leans closely into enterprise-level performance, making it ultimate for groups requiring formal documentation and thoughts mapping.

Visio’s depth of diagramming choices is improbable. Whereas testing, I used to be impressed by its means to deal with all the things from fundamental flowcharts to intricate community architectures, flooring plans, and organizational charts. Visio’s options are onerous to beat in case your thoughts mapping usually intersects with technical fields.

Its integration with the Microsoft Workplace ecosystem is one other large win. Since I usually use Phrase, Excel, and PowerPoint in my workflow, Visio’s means to tug knowledge straight from these instruments made creating data-driven diagrams a breeze. For instance, I linked an Excel sheet to a thoughts map, and Visio auto-populated parts based mostly on my knowledge—one thing I hadn’t seen with most different instruments.

One distinctive characteristic I appreciated was its real-time collaboration via Microsoft Groups. This integration made it straightforward to collaborate on diagrams with my crew, even when working remotely. I may share a dwell model of a thoughts map and get instant suggestions, which streamlined our decision-making course of.

That stated, Visio isn’t for everybody. Its superior options include a steeper studying curve and are geared towards enterprise customers moderately than informal brainstormers. The price may also add up shortly, particularly for groups that want the total suite of instruments.

General, Visio excels in technical diagramming and structured thoughts mapping, but it surely’s finest suited to professionals or groups requiring detailed and formalized visualizations moderately than informal brainstormers or solo customers.

What I dislike about Visio:

• As a brand new consumer, navigating Visio’s superior options took lots of effort and time
• I imagine Visio is best suited to structured, technical work moderately than freeform concept technology

What G2 customers dislike about Visio:

“The UI may appear just a little intimidating to these not skilled with diagramming instruments. Moreover, some folks or small companies could also be delay by the fee construction, which is on the upper finish of the vary for such devices.”

– Visio Evaluate, Siddharth Okay.

Get one step nearer to reworking your artistic processes and tasks via design considering.